Finally a Gun That Makes Bullets Go Where You Tell Them To

September 12th, 2008

Savage Rocks

I just got back from the range. I shot 100 rounds from the .17 HMR, 50 from the S&W 27-2 with new Pachmayr grips, and 50 from the SW1911. What a day.

I started with the target at 50 yards, and the first shot hit the paper. From then on, it was a simple matter of adjusting the scope. This is about 15 shots, I think:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%2017%20hmr%2050%20yards%20sight%20in%20web.jpg

The first shot is below the frame. You can already see how easy this gun is to shoot. Here’s the second 50-yard group:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%2017%20hmr%2050%20yards%2015%20shots%20web.jpg

The bullets started going through the same hole. It was clear that shooting at 50 yards was a complete waste of time, so I stopped and moved back. Here’s what happened as I sighted the scope in and tried to figure out what I was doing:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%2017%20hmr%20100%20yards%20sighting%20in%20web.jpg

I had some trouble getting comfortable and finding the right place to put my right hand. When I grip the gun naturally, my finger contacts the trigger up by the stock, which is no good, so I had to keep moving it down. And I had problems figuring out where to put my cheek; it made the optics seem all wobbly. Finally I developed a little bit of a routine, but not before this happened:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%2017%20hmr%20100%20yards%20second%20group%20web.jpg

Am I complaining? No. That’s a small target. The group is smaller than a tennis ball. By my standards, that is good shooting.

I started to get it together on the third group. You can see the shots glomming into several distinct areas. The central area, which is where they went when I did things right, and then the other areas, where they went when I did stupid things:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%2017%20hmr%20100%20yards%20final%20group%20web.jpg

I still feel uncomfortable with my shooting rest. It’s too damned low. I don’t understand how anyone can be comfortable with a rest less than ten inches high. Maybe I should get a tall bipod. And I see what Chris Byrne was talking about, when he said target stocks make for better geometry. But I think this one will be okay once I get used to it. I think the scope is too far back; he mentioned that, too. When my eye is too close to the rear lens, the optical sweet spot gets small and wanders around, making it hard to center the target.

I ordered Pachmayr grips for my Smith & Wesson 27-2, so I decided to shoot it today. The results were horrendous. I think the heavy spring may be part of the problem. Also, after my long layoff, I just plain forgot how to hold the grip:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%20357%2027-2%2050%20shots%207%20yards%20web.jpg

That was humiliating. So I took out the SW1911 to see if my problem extended to all pistols. I shot considerably better, so I didn’t feel the need to seek therapy.

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%20sw1911%207%20yards%2050%20shots%20web.jpg

Here’s the rifle on the rest:

09%2012%2008%20trail%20glades%2017%20hmr%20gun%20on%20bench%20web.jpg

I highly recommend the Savage Mark II .17 HMR rifles. This thing shoots itself, and it was cheap. The 14 power Burris Fullfield II scope is great. I’m glad I didn’t go smaller. At a hundred yards, I can see the holes without a spotting scope.

Fantastic day.

No Comments »

Let’s Win One for the Gaffer

September 12th, 2008

This Campaign has Performed an Illegal Operation and Will be Shut Down

I hope Karl Rove is keeping his payments to Barack Obama current. The Golden Child is doing a wonderful job, generating gaffes to help John McCain.

Today’s atrocity? A TV ad with the following message: JOHN MCCAIN SHOULD NOT BE ELECTED PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE’S OLD.

Proving they know exactly what they’re doing, “Obama spokesman Dan Pfeiffer said the campaign was not making an issue of the 72-year-old McCain’s age.” If this pig had any more lipstick on it, the weight would pull its hind legs off the ground. Pfeiffer went on to bulk up his credibility with the following remarks: “Up is down, September is actually July, and I’m definitely not wearing my underwear.”

The ad features a disco ball. It features unflattering 1982 footage of McCain in Congress. It has a short piece of what appears to be a commercial made in the Fifties. It reminds everyone that he hasn’t mastered crucial Presidential skills, such as email, Myspace, Google, Youtube, Napster, and Facebook.

John McCain is an old fart! He doesn’t know how to SUPERPOKE people! He can’t send Naughty Gifts or Booze Mail! He has ZERO Myspace friends! He has never answered a Nigerian spam letter! We can’t let a guy like that in the White House! Where are his piercings? Where is his Ipod? Where is his creepy little post-90s chin beard? Are you kidding me? This guy is DANGEROUS! We can have Mac, and we’re electing PC’s dad!

What are we going to do, when Putin goes nuts and decides to nuke Poland, and John McCain can’t put a rebuke on Putin’s Facebook Fun Wall?

I have to ask. When did we decide it was okay to discriminate against job applicants based on age? Didn’t liberals coin the term “ageism”? Didn’t they afflict us with laws making age discrimination an incredibly expensive federal tort?

You want age discrimination? I’ll give it to you. The Constitution says you can’t be President until you’re 35, and it was written at a time when a lot of folks dropped dead before reaching that age. What does that tell you? It tells you the framers were more worried about hiring immature punks than they were about Presidents who have to use reading glasses.

Some people–lunatics, I guess–have the crazy idea that human beings learn as they age. They think older people are wiser and more mature. We need to find these people and deprogram them. Then we can fix the Constitution and elect our new co-Presidents, the Olsen twins.

If old is bad, what the hell is Joe Biden doing on Obama’s ticket? He’s SIXTY-FIVE. Joe Biden is NINE DAYS OLDER THAN OBAMA’S MOTHER. On November 20, he’ll have a birthday, and then he won’t be able to serve, because it will be time to turn him into Soylent Green.

Please, please, let Biden pick up on this and try to change his image. He’s insecure enough to do it. He already has plugs and glowing blue teeth. Please, just once before I die, let me watch Joe Biden try to skate on a half-pipe. Let him throw up ONE gang sign at a debate. Then I could die happy. Here’s what he should say when they interview him on Nickelodeon:

Is it because they didn’t work hard? My ancestors, who worked in the Apple stores of Northeast Pennsylvania and would come up after 12 hours and play Wii for four hours? No, it’s not because they weren’t as smart. It’s not because they didn’t work as hard. It’s because they didn’t have a pair of Crocs upon which to stand. Dude.”

I want to see Biden in Mountain Dew commercials. I want to see him play a high school kid on his own DNC-financed sitcom: That 40s Show. That makes Obama Fez. Just imagine it. “Olbermann, to you I say good day!” Then John McCain can come in with a beer in his hand and call Biden “dumbass.”

Let’s see. The Democrats have made it clear they hate working moms. They hate Christians. They hate gun owners. They hate teenage girls who have sex before marriage. Now they hate old people. Who’s next? Who’s left? They call themselves the Big Tent party, but the biggest tent is the one they’re filling with people they detest.

I don’t know what McCain should do about this. Maybe Pfeiffer and Obama should both be grounded.

McCain continues creeping up in the polls, like the shuffleboard scores of a retiree who has just discovered Celebrex. Obama continues working his helpful magic. When a person whose primary job is PR thinks he can do no wrong, wrong is what he is most likely to do. Keep scolding the press, B. Hussein. Keep attacking demographic segments you need in order to survive. This is like the scene in Fight Club, where Ed Norton goes into his boss’s office and beats himself up. You’re doing something the Republicans could never do in their own right.

Hurry, November. Let’s get this thing finished before Illinois mounts a Senatorial recall election.

No Comments »

Electoral Near-Tie?

September 11th, 2008

Get Oprah Some Fresh Dress Shields

The other day, I was writing enthusiastically about McCain’s poll numbers, and people told me the electoral map was what really mattered. I said it seemed to me that if the national poll changed, the electoral numbers would have to follow it. It doesn’t really make sense to have a big change in popular-vote polls without an accompanying, albeit delayed, shift in the electoral picture. Think about it. The planets have to line up a certain way in order for the popular vote and the electoral vote to conflict. It’s not normal.

I guess I was right. Take a look at Realclearpolitics: the latest electoral map shows Obama with 217 votes and McCain with 216. Nearly even.

I hope Obama continues to offend and pat himself on the back and cry victim. I hope he keeps scolding and patronizing the press. It might eventually become fashionable for mainstream journalists to pretend they knew he was a brat all along.

Today McCain said he would offer Obama a cabinet post. It was a silly thing to say, but it may have a positive effect. There may be some BO voters out there who aren’t totally sure about Obama as President, but who would like to see him in the picture somewhere.

If we’re still seeing good numbers on Monday, I think Obama will officially be over.

No Comments »

Eezox Orgy

September 11th, 2008

Wonder How it Would Taste on Toast

Based on advice from gun people, I took the Savage apart, blasted the metal parts with carb cleaner, and applied Eezox. And I cleaned the barrel with a Boresnake, while the barrel was wet with Eezox. We’ll see if it does anything.

I think I goofed by hosing the trigger mechanism with carb cleaner. It has some kind of thick grease on the spring. But since the carb cleaner didn’t do much to remove it, I suppose I’m okay.

I was not sure how much Eezox to apply. I sprayed the gun liberally and then wiped it until there was only a thin film. Now I’m letting everything dry.

Sound good?

Success

I only have one part left over! Doesn’t look too important.

No Comments »

Ike Messes With Texas

September 11th, 2008

Teach Him a Lesson

Jim from Smoke on the Water has issued a prayer request. He and his significant other, Iris, closed on a house five weeks ago. In GALVESTON. On a BARRIER ISLAND.

They are preparing for Ike right now. Pray it hits France.

Not really, but you get the idea.

No Comments »

Meat!

September 11th, 2008

I Need This

It’s Boliche Day. Winn-Dixie put eye roast on sale, so I snapped one up, along with a very long chorizo to stuff in it.

This is a wonderful Cuban dish. The best way to fix it is to use a pressure cooker. Regrettably, it’s not all that unhealthy.

I’m putting the recipe up at the forum.

No Comments »

Rings, at Last

September 11th, 2008

All Systems Go

Am I silly to get such thrills out of little things? Today a package arrived from Midwayusa, and I’m beside myself.

A while back, I bought a .17 HMR rifle. But I couldn’t use it. The 42mm objective on the scope, combined with the thickness of the varmint barrel, made it necessary to get extra-high scope rings, which were not available locally. I had to order the damn things. So my rifle, ammunition, bag, and sling have been sitting on the bedroom floor.

Today the box arrived. I put the rings on, and everything lines up fine. I have 500 rounds, waiting to be shot. I can’t wait. But I will. Because it’s windy today. Tomorrow should be better. The wind won’t mess up my rifle shooting all that much, because the targets are supported by two legs. On the pistol side, the wind will make the targets rock and twist; the targets are mounted on a single pole.

I didn’t lap the scope rings. I’m not sure I need to, and I didn’t feel like dropping 30 bucks on a tool of questionable value.

I chose Weaver Grand Slam rings, because they have levers that don’t fall off when you fool with the scope. The regular rings have parts you can lose. I had a hell of a time getting these rings to work, because I wrongly assumed they worked on some kind of cam action, with a limited swing on the levers. In fact, each lever turns a screw, so you have to turn it many times to back it out and open the rings for mounting.

I also got Eezox. Not sure what to do with it.

Since this is a rimfire, I assumed I needed minimal eye relief. Tell me if I’m wrong, before I poke a hole in my forehead. I mounted the scope as far back as I could get it.

Savage%2017%20HMR%20w%20scope%20and%20sling.jpg

This was a glorious purchase. Scope and all, it’s cheaper than a nice pistol.

Let me know if that sling looks right. There were no instructions.

No Comments »

Gifts Take Surprising Shapes

September 11th, 2008

Be Careful About Throwing Them Away

A reader sent me a blog link today. It’s about a lady who took her four-year-old daughter to see John McCain and Sarah Palin. Her daughter has Down’s Syndrome.

It occurred to me, as I read the entry, that they may be an unexpected benefit to a Sarah Palin Vice Presidency. It may change people’s attitudes toward kids with Down’s Syndrome and other problems.

It’s not something that should be milked for political advantage, but it seems inevitable, should John McCain win. We’ll be seeing Trig Palin on the news over and over, surrounded by a loving family. He’s already a Youtube hit; everyone has seen the short clip of his sister, grooming his hair.

The prospect of having a handicapped kid scares people. I assume. Surely that’s the reason so many handicapped babies are aborted. The thought has certainly scared me. I hope the abortions are not the result of a sick desire to have “perfect” children to show off, although maybe I’m naive. I believe many couples and single women see ominous prenatal test results and choose abortion, simply because they think raising a handicapped child will be too hard for them.

That attitude will necessarily be eroded by the spectacle of a warm, loving family with a child who has Down’s Syndrome. I don’t know how many people the message will reach, but I’m sure a large number of pregnant women will be influenced, and that they’ll take the healthier path, confronting the problem instead of running from it.

As a nation, we aren’t all that familiar with Down’s Syndrome. Sometimes we see ridiculous movies and TV shows which stupidly portray retarded people as the smartest folks around, but saying those efforts teach us about Down’s Syndrome is like saying G.I. Jane taught us about the Navy Seals. A real-life example will have much more impact.

People whose children have physical problems seem fairly united in their perceptions. For the most part, they tell us their experiences have been fulfilling and surprising. That makes sense. We were put here to face challenges like this. God didn’t create us to have “show families,” the way some people have show dogs and show horses. We are supposed to have problems, and the hope is that by facing them with faith and principle, we can turn them into blessings. This is something I find hard to remember, at times when it can serve me best. I don’t blame other people for forgetting. But it’s still true.

Man’s way of making life perfect is quick and futile. God’s way is slow, subtle, and lasting. You could say God’s approach is nuanced, if you wanted to start a fight.

We always say a child is a gift from God; presumably a child with a special challenge is a special gift. Maybe each of those medical waste bags the abortion industry has filled represents a gift that has been rejected. It’s an awful thing to consider.

Maybe the seeming imperfection of the Palin family is a gift to our nation, which we should study carefully before we turn it down.

In the sidebar to your left, you will find a link to Care-Net.

No Comments »

Suggestion for the Talking Heads

September 10th, 2008

THINK

Regarding the election…I think it would be wise if commentators, when discussing the Republican VP choice, would stop saying McCain “tapped” Sarah Palin.

No Comments »

Venezuela Acting all Uppity

September 10th, 2008

Didn’t the Dalai Obama say They Were Harmless?

Fausta thinks we may be on the verge of another Cold War. I’m glad I went on Ebay and bought those electric boxers.

Correction

A reader informs me that it’s not actually cold during a Cold War. Apparently it’s just an expression.

No Comments »

BDS in the DSM?

September 10th, 2008

Suspicions Confirmed

I have wonderful news.

At last, science has an explanation for liberalism.

No Comments »

Why I Don’t do Bumper Stickers

September 10th, 2008

First Amendment Unimportant to Liberals

Moxie lives in California, the land of tolerance. See how Californians express their tolerance for a McCain banner on private property.

Better still: if you leave the banner up so people can see what happened, the city tries to force you to remove it.

More

While you’re there, read about the shocking sliming of B. Hussein.

No Comments »

Obama’s Marriage to the Press on the Rocks?

September 10th, 2008

Who Gets Custody of Joe Biden?

Ben Smith at Politico points out something interesting. Barack Obama just kicked the press out of bed and took his money off the dresser.

In his bizarre, whiny, faux-patriotic response (see Otter’s courtroom scene in Animal House), Obama began to criticize the press for paying attention to his pig/lipstick/smelly fish gaffe. He began ranting about how “the news media” were going after the story, and he compared it to catnip. He said America (stand, place hand over heart) was the true victim.

What Smith omits from his quote is Obama’s feeble effort to make it look like he’s not really criticizing the press. Obama expressly went after the press, but then after the words “This is what they want to spend two of the last 55 days talking about,” he tried to turn it around, claiming “they” meant McCain’s people.

Let’s be honest. He did swerve toward McCain at the end. But that was only after he made it very clear he was trying to run down the press.

What will happen now? If there is one thing the press hates as much or more than a Republican candidate, it’s being told how to do its job. Barack Obama can’t handle criticism, but compared to the press, he’s gracious. The press has a long memory and a short fuse. And it is nearly impossible to beat them, once the bombs start flying.

How can this man be so ungrateful? The press sent three news anchors on his ridiculous jaunt to Europe. They put Sarah Palin on a magazine cover over the words “Babies Lies & Scandal,” one week after putting him and his wife behind “Michelle Obama: Why Barack Loves Her.” They ignored the first half of McCain’s campaign. They continue to ignore Obama’s confessed-terrorist buddy, Bill Ayres. They sat on the Edwards scandal because they thought he might be Obama’s running mate. They practically groped Obama at the debates. They made an icky homoerotic remark about tingling legs. They uncritically published lie after lie about Sarah Palin, even as untrained bloggers with day jobs were disproving the rumors. How can he risk alienating an utterly corrupt journalistic establishment, which fawns over him as if he pooped diamonds and cancer vaccines?

The press loves him so much, they’ve had to discipline themselves. The cable pseudopod of NBC, the farthest-left, least self-aware network, actually became embarrassed by Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews and removed them from their anchor posts. You can’t buy friends like that. They are irreplaceable.

How does he think he got where he is? He’s a junior senator with 143 days of work behind him and no major accomplishments. Before that, he was a state senator with no major accomplishments. Before that, he was a political machine flunky. He’s not even a real lawyer; he has never had a practice. He thinks he jumped to the top of Mount Everest, and now he’s throwing rocks at the Sherpas who carried him.

The most likely thing is that the press will bite its collective tongue and suffer the insults until he’s elected. But maybe they won’t. They brought Gary Hart down, after he dared them to prove he was an adulterer. They might give the Precious a dose of the same bitter medicine.

To paraphrase Dean Vernon Wormer, maybe it’s time someone put his foot down. And that foot is the press.

No Comments »

Obama: “If You Claim I Insulted You, You Must be Lying or Stupid.”

September 10th, 2008

The Voice of Class

Barack Obama’s mouth is like Pandora’s box. A helpful aide should glue it shut, while there is still someone Obama hasn’t offended.

Yesterday, we learned that Obama used the old “lipstick on a pig” joke, which appeared to be a reference to Sarah Palin, who made a famous and very recent joke in which she said lipstick was the only difference between pit bulls and she and her fellow “hockey moms.” He compounded the error by making an ill-advised reference to a smelly piece of fish.

Today, Obama gave us his official response. And it was a beauty. He said–smirking–that this was a “made-up controversy” of the type of which the public was tired. There was no apology. There was no acknowledgment that anyone could have taken legitimate offense.

He made his remarks at a high school. How appropriate.

There is about a two percent chance his pig remark was not aimed at Palin, so he could be excused if he claimed he wasn’t referring to her. But a mature man would have apologized, anyway. He should have said, “I can see how people would misunderstand. I am sorry if it appeared that I was insulting Governor Palin, and I did not mean it that way.” Instead, we saw the now-familiar, highly insensitive face of the Chosen One, dismissively chiding blasphemers and implying that those who claim they were offended are lying. And he ignored the PUMAs, who have nothing to do with the McCain campaign, and who are more angry than anyone.

Before the PUMAs arrived on the scene, I did not realize how badly Obama’s arrogance and contempt offend people. Since they started creating blogs and message boards, my eyes have been opened. They complain about sexism, disrespect, and bullying. They see Obama as a spoiled child who becomes indignant when criticized, and who feels entitled to a cushy ride into the White House, as if it were somehow his birthright. The more I read and the more I watch, the more I see what they’re talking about.

Here are two examples of what they perceive as crass Obama behavior.

At a rally in Iowa, Obama’s people played a rap song as background music. The refrain? “99 Problems but a bitch ain’t one.” Look it up. I’m not joking. Using rap music, in and of itself, is evidence that contempt for women doesn’t bother you. Rap’s history of vile sexism is indisputable. Using that song at a rally, while you’re trying to beat a powerful female opponent, is just plain over the top. And a song that crude and antisocial is inappropriate at a rally, no matter what the circumstances are.

We know campaigns fret a great deal about the music they use. They choose it with care, they think about the message, and they worry about how the public will take it. They even pay for rights. Right now, the McCain campaign is involved in a kerfuffle with 80s band Heart, because the campaign bought the right to use “Barracuda” to promote Sarah Palin. Obama’s people can claim they didn’t think about the rap lyrics, or that they didn’t know the song would be played, but the obvious and reasonable presumption is that they reviewed it and approved of it. Did Obama apologize? I see no record of it.

In April, in Raleigh, North Carolina, a bruised and petulant Barack Obama discussed the spanking Hillary Clinton had given him at a televised debate. While making childish remarks, he raised his right hand to his cheek, pulled back his index and ring fingers, and brushed his cheek beneath his right eye. Any high school student can tell you what this means. It’s a way to give someone the finger, while pretending not to. It’s an ancient and widely used insult. Every teacher has seen it a thousand times. You can see it in the movie “Aliens.” The character Sergeant Apone uses it in response to a stupid question from a private.

Now, maybe Obama’s cheek itched. Maybe the supporters, who sat behind him on the stage and broke up with laughter as he made the gesture, were laughing about something else. But the L.A. Times–not known for its hostility to Obama–thought there was enough doubt to justify running an item on one of its blogs. And again, if there was an apology, it’s not very obvious in Google searches.

This is the guy who thinks diplomacy is his great strength. He’s going to sweet-talk our enemies until they make peace with us. If he can’t be tactful and respectful in a political campaign, how are we supposed to believe he can charm the Iranians and North Koreans? So far, his efforts at charm have been limited to convincing slum dwellers that the government owes them more stuff. That’s not a job that requires a Clarence Darrow.

I won’t complain. Every time he stiffens his neck and refuses to be gracious, he moves votes into the McCain column.

Sun Tzu said, “If your opponent is quick to anger, seek to irritate him.” Maybe that’s the recipe for a McCain win. Call Obama on his disdain and narcissism, and wait for him to respond like an angry adolescent. He simply can’t take the heat. He treats criticism aimed at him the way jihadis treat criticism of Mohammed; it’s as if you’re criticizing someone he worships. Remember how upset he got when Maureen Dowd talked about his ears? If George Bush (or any other prominent Republican politician) were that sensitive, he would have killed himself by now. He makes John McCain seem almost serene, and that’s saying something.

It’s no wonder the PUMAs call Obama “the Precious.”

Maybe we should start calling him “Radar,” “Dumbo,” and “Jughead,” just to see if he throws a fit.

I’m glad Obama is working so hard to help us win. I don’t think we could pull it off without him.

No Comments »

BO Serves up a Steaming Bowl of PUMA Chow

September 9th, 2008

This is Too Easy

If there is one thing female Clinton voters love, it’s seeing women compared to pigs and pieces of smelly old fish.

HOW MUCH IS KARL ROVE PAYING THIS MAN?

I realize it’s possible to twist a speaker’s words and get a result the speaker did not intend. But you would have to be stupid to make remarks like this and not realize how they would be taken.

More

In case you live in a bunker, let me give you the particulars. He uttered the ancient “lipstick on a pig” crack, clearly referring to Sarah Palin, and then he said something about old fish stinking even after you wrap it in newspaper.

More

Here’s comforting proof, for the Golden Child, that REPUBLICANS ARE CRAZY WHEN THEY CLAIM HILLARY VOTERS WILL VOTE FOR SARAH PALIN.

Let me extend my hand to the PUMAs in peace. Look, you got screwed. We got screwed. None of us got what we wanted. Let’s all agree that regardless of McCain’s failure to totally satisfy, he’s better than the Dalai Obama. And he’ll put a woman in the White House.

More

Here’s a very typical comment of one of those Hillary supporters who definitely won’t be abandoning Obama for McCain. About Obama, she says: “He’s such an awful disgusting arrogant bile-filled trail of cat sick.”

More

Here is the official, solitary talking point the Obama flaks are uttering on cue: “Obama didn’t call Sarah Palin a pig.”

That is true.

He just IMPLIED it as hard as he could.

Was it unintentional? Maybe. If he’s high on PCP.

No Comments »