Election of Nut Stimulates Gun Boom
I’ve been planning to get myself an M1 carbine, because I think it would be a fun and interesting home-defense weapon. But now I’m wondering if I should buy something foreign instead.
I don’t know much about executive orders, but people who do are voicing concern that Obama will use executive orders to remove many types of ammunition and guns from commerce. Instantly. In January. They are especially worried about cheap foreign ammunition and military-style weapons.
Obama hates guns, and he wants to take them away from us. He weasels about it, and he even lies about it. Nonetheless, it’s true. His history proves it. He’s a big-city sissy, he has probably never fired a gun in his life, and he thinks guns are evil, in and of themselves. One particularly scary thing about his weasel language is that he loves using the word “sportsmen.” This is liberal gun-grabber code for “I have no respect for the rights of people who buy guns for self-defense.” It’s his way of telling us he’ll go after self-defense weapons first. Your AK. Your AR15. Your 1911. Then he’ll let us cool down, and THEN he’ll come for our hunting weapons. Our shotguns and deer rifles.
The gun-haters among us don’t like sporting guns much. But they truly, TRULY hate self-defense guns. And there are a lot of Americans who will stand up for hunters, yet who will abandon people who own guns strictly for self-defense. This is what the Obama regime is counting on. Politically, it’s much easier to take away a Bushmaster than a squirrel gun. So Obama says he sympathizes with “sportsmen.” And Americans who aren’t bright or attentive assume he is referring to all gun owners. It’s a sleazy tactic. It’s obvious to smart people. But most Americans are not geniuses; they can’t see it.
I don’t know how brave he’ll be in January. Maybe he’s not crazy enough to fulfill expectations. But he probably is. The Clintons were. And George Bush’s dad dealt us a crippling blow, even though he was supposedly a Republican.
If Obama does what he really wants to do, AK-based guns are going to get very hard to find. They’re already harder to find than they used to be. We used to have lots of good, inexpensive rifles to choose from. Then the government choked off the supply. Now a nice AK with a milled receiver costs a thousand dollars. We’re not talking about a gorgeous, tightly assembled technological marvel. We’re talking about the world’s favorite peasant rifle. Something that should cost five hundred bucks, tops. Next year, the price may shoot up to two thousand, and after that, we would be limited to buying used.
So I’m wondering if I should get an AK and let the M1 wait. I don’t have any AKs. A folding job would be very handy around the house, under certain circumstances.
The AK market is incredibly confusing, for a person like me. I don’t know much about guns. I’m fairly sure I want a rifle with a milled receiver. People say they’re more accurate and more pleasant to shoot, and that they last longer. There aren’t many alternatives at a reasonable price. In fact, I only know of one. The Golani, which is a Galil assembled from parts. It’s supposed to be a great gun, but there are problems. First of all, there are a lot of complaints about the receivers deforming. These parts are American-made, and many people say they don’t compare to the originals. Second, people claim the parts used to make these guns are used, and that they come from places like Guatemala. That sounds bad. Finally, the cheap ones are assembled by Century Arms, and there are disturbing photos on the web showing mashed parts and bad ejectors built up with welded material. You can build one yourself, but you’re still stuck with the US receiver, unless you shell out for an IMI. And I believe you need a bunch of exotic tools, like a hydraulic press.
The Bulgarians still make a few nice guns. They make an AK with a folding stock. There is a pre-ban version, and there’s a post-ban version. The difference? No idea. The manufacturer’s site doesn’t make it clear. You’ll pay a minimum of a thousand dollars.
You can get a VEPR from Robinson Arms. This may be the best option. They’re supposed to be superb. If arms laws loosen up (conceivable), the foreign weapons will drop in value, but the VEPR probably won’t, since it’s a limited-run custom piece. But they only sell big long jobs you wouldn’t want to use against a burglar. Can they be modified to be more handy? Search me.
I’d like to have something that holds 30 rounds, can be shot accurately with the stock folded, and goes “bang” every time. It has to hit man-sized targets easily at distances under a hundred feet, without the sights. It can’t recoil so much it’s hard to keep on target. I think the M1 carbine may fill the bill, and I’m pretty sure the AK does, too. Arsenal makes something called an SAS-M7 that looks really good.
I wonder if the Obama policy stooges realize they are stimulating people to build “home arsenals.” Were it not for the artificial inflation and shortages caused by our stupid, heavy-handed gun laws, I would have little motivation to stock up on things. If I get an AK, I’ll want a thousand rounds of ammunition, minimum, from the word “go.” It’s cheap now; it may be expensive next year. I’d be a fool to wait. If the laws were reasonably, I wouldn’t be interested in the gun OR the ammunition right now.
If I do the shopping I need to do over the coming month, I’ll probably end up with 3,000 or more rounds of ammunition lying around, in various calibers. I don’t want that. I would much rather keep smaller quantities. But I have to face reality. Small amounts of ammunition are costly, and ammunition prices and availability can’t be trusted right now, so the smart move is to buy big.
I know the gun-haters don’t realize this is how “home arsenals” develop. They think they’re spawned by a kook mentality; by a desire to be ready to hold off the police for hours. That’s only true of a tiny percentage of gun owners. I can’t imagine a plausible self-defense scenario that would require me to have more than 50 rounds on hand. If gun laws made sense, gun owners would buy less stuff. Right now, gun vendors are paying off their mortgages and retiring, thanks to the great genius, Obama.
Advice from gun nuts appreciated.