Welcome to the Evangelical Mansonian Church

November 15th, 2009

Please Overlook our Founder’s Little Faults

This morning I was reading Larry Huch’s The Torah Blessing, and I was somewhat startled by some quotations he produced.

Martin Luther said the Jews were “full of the devil’s feces … which they wallow in like swine.” He also said, “We are at fault in not slaying them” for avenging the crucifixion.

“Avenging”? We’re supposed to punish them for the single most beneficial act that has ever occurred? An act God himself put in motion? An act for which every sinner (including Martin Luther) bears responsibility? Maybe we should also “avenge” the parting of the Red Sea or the provision of manna in the wilderness.

I will never understand this idiotic line of reasoning.

I don’t know why the Lutheran church continues to use the name “Lutheran.” Surely it’s obvious that this man was not worthy of honor. Isn’t uniting in his name a little like putting a sign in front of your church which says, “We hate Jews”? If I were a Lutheran bigwig, I’d be agitating to drop his name from the church. The church is the bride of Christ, not the bride of Martin Luther the Jew-hating loony.

Why don’t Christians talk more about this? This twisted, corrupted character should be unceremoniously removed from the pantheon of honored Christian thinkers. A certain amount of error can be excused, but saying we are sinning by not exterminating the Jews is beyond any realistic hope of rehabilitation. Maybe he was right about some things. But then Hitler was right about Volkswagens and superhighways.

The problem with defending this miserable, benighted person or hiding his faults is that we’re the only ones doing these things. I’m sure the Jews are highly aware of his bigotry and hatred. I doubt they run around making up excuses for it, the way we do. How can we build bridges between Jews and Christians if we’re not willing to let embarrassing idiots go?

To me, this is like the Confederate flag. I’m a Southerner, and I used to think the flag was neat, and then I thought about what it represented: a regime that supported slavery. Whatever the merits of the Confederacy might have been, there is no way to excuse resisting abolition. You can’t say, “Well, it’s okay that we flogged the flesh off other human beings, bought and sold them, broke up families, and held them captive…because we also wanted tax reform!”

So I’m on the side of people who want to take that stupid, shameful flag off of state buildings. If you’re determined to celebrate your Southern-ness, make yourself a flag with Elvis on it, or maybe a bucket of chicken.

Luther wanted to confiscate Jewish property. He wrote a book called On the Jews and Their Lies. Continuing to use this nut’s name is a great way to help Jewish anti-missionaries. Without even checking, I’ll bet he is featured prominently in their materials. I’d be all over that, if I were an anti-missionary.

Huch cites other anti-Semitic Christian figures. We need to renounce these buffoons and their poison. Jesus died a Jew, as did the Apostles. Our faith is fundamentally Jewish. It’s strange that some people who claim to be sincere and knowledgeable Christians feel entitled to slander and threaten the root on which we were grafted.

Most non-Catholic Americans don’t really know much about the older churches. We don’t know the more vile and disgusting parts of their histories. We don’t know about their ongoing failures to renounce the disgraces of the past. I feel certain religious Jews know about these things. Those of us who belong to denominations that recognize our debt to the Jews should make an effort to distance ourselves from the bile and excrement certain Christians have exuded or embraced in the past. It’s harder to ask this of people who belong to older churches, but they need to get with it, too. God has told us that in order to approach him, we have to make things right with other human beings. He won’t answer a husband’s prayers if the husband doesn’t love his wife. He won’t receive an offering from someone who deprives a creditor or mistreats a parent. He won’t pay attention to communion if we don’t forgive and seek forgiveness. How, then, is he supposed to work unhindered in a church that hasn’t repented of slandering Jews?

We like to use the words “Antichrist” and “anti-christian” all the time. The Antichrist is a figure who will arise and persecute the church. “Anti-christian” refers to the broader phenomenon of the persecution of God’s people.

This stuff is based in the spirit realm. Satan and his subordinates cause these things to occur. They sow the seeds. They fan the fires.

What most Christians don’t realize is that the same spirits that drive the persecution of Christians drive anti-Semitism. It’s all about thwarting prophecy and preventing God from carrying out his plan. Various Old Testament villains tried to destroy the Jewish race, as did Hitler. Pharaoh tried to prevent the birth of Moses. Herod tried to prevent the birth of Jesus. The Romans murdered Christians as though they were roaches and termites. Sooner or later, someone will try to kill off the Jews so the 144,000 mentioned in the Revelation can’t be born. It’s all the same thing. There is no difference between anti-Jewish hatred and anti-Christian hatred, because to Satan, we’re all in the same camp. The fact that he often gets us to fight each other is irrelevant. That’s just part of his program; it’s always a good idea to get your enemies to save you work by attacking each other.

Christian anti-Semitism is driven by anti-Christian spirits. If you persecute the Jews, a spirit of antichrist is in you. If more of us realized that, we would be a lot less eager to pat ourselves on the back and congratulate ourselves for being clever enough to recognize the true Messiah. What fools we are, to think we are inherently superior. Our forebears conducted the Inquisition. If we’re so smart and so righteous, how did things like that happen?

Thinking we are smarter or more righteous than the Jews, who gave us everything that matters, is shockingly arrogant and moronic. It is completely contradictory to the obvious evidence before us. We’ve done a great deal of evil. We have nothing to crow about. Every good thing we have done happened because the Holy Spirit overrode our natural inclinations, which are as malevolent and misguided as everyone else’s.

I don’t know if I would endorse everything Huch says. I haven’t finished the book yet, and it seems to verge on legalism, but the bit about Martin Luther really grabbed my attention.

8 Responses to “Welcome to the Evangelical Mansonian Church”

  1. pbird Says:

    Can’t argue with any of that, at all.

  2. Elisson Says:

    I’m a little surprised that Martin Luther’s antisemitism is a surprise to you… but what do I know, anyway?

    I believe that a lot of Luther’s venom came from frustration. He was all nicey-nicey to the Jews… until it became apparent that, despite the reforms he was pressing upon the Catholic church, they were still not interested in converting to his “new and improved” brand of Christianity. And that pissed him off, big-time.

    Thoughtful post, for which I thank you.

  3. Steve B Says:

    I’ve always wondered about this. For a Christian to bash Jews shows a fundamental lack of understanding of basic Scripture.

    THEY are the True Vine, WE have been grafted in. We are essentially adopted into the family. So to harbor some resentment or ill-will towards the Jewish people and faith is 1)stupid, and 2) a bit like petty jealousy?

    The Jews didn’t kill Jesus. It was a political assassination by the Pharisees because he threatened their power base. That said, nothing happened save that God allowed it.

    Everything we have today in the way of a “church” was founded by “Messianic” Jews.

  4. MunDane68 Says:

    Steve,

    Do not mix the messenger with the message. It becomes very easy once you do that to start deciding that you know who the ‘true’ Christians are and denounce the heretics and apostates. It is never up to us, as Christians, to decide who is our brother and sister in Christ. I often giggle to myself at the thought of some of the uptight, priggish members of my congregation sharing space with some of the more freewheeling types…and then I think, who is outside my comfort zone? Who will end up as my ‘neighbor’? The tattoo’d gang-banger? The rap ‘artist’? An Aztlan reconquistore? My In-laws? Christ’s blood covers them a well as I. Their sins are forgiven as are mine.

  5. km Says:

    The bulk of the Lutheran church (that which isn’t the Missouri Synod minority) seem to be well embracing the full liberal agenda, and the liberal wing is brimming with anti-Semitism too.
    .
    So the name is, if anything, growing more fitting by the day – other than, of course, Luther’s strong stance in defending the authority of Scripture (no matter what points he missed the boat on).

  6. Steve H. Says:

    “Do not mix the messenger with the message.”
    .
    The only thing that offends me is that the church would put this evil person’s name in its own name. It’s no exaggeration to say that this is as insensitive as naming a church after Hitler.

  7. greg zywicki Says:

    Missouri Synod’s take:http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=2166

    ELCA seems to have some statement too:http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1026227004.html;jsessionid=EF581E4CBCB0AF5864DB47E4BE4EBBCD.ehctc1

    Upshot, in my opinion – Luther didn’t lead any pogroms or jihads against jews. His name isn’t synonymous with violence or hatred against them. The church with his name isn’t into that, and at least in the US has no unusual history in these regards.

    Lots of churches supported slavery. Some still support keeping women down. The name thing is more problematic, but all-in-all the central and revolutionary message of Faith alone, Word alone, and Christ alone trumps the rest.

    As for this:”The bulk of the Lutheran church (that which isn’t the Missouri Synod minority) seem to be well embracing the full liberal agenda, and the liberal wing is brimming with anti-Semitism too.”

    Bwahhh?

  8. Steve H. Says:

    “Luther didn’t lead any pogroms or jihads against jews.”
    .
    Only because he couldn’t find the manpower to do it.
    .
    “His name isn’t synonymous with violence or hatred against them.”
    .
    Among Jews, his name is synonymous for hatred against them. Ask a rabbi. Christians have a totally different view of the older churches, because we ignore their faults. And because they haven’t tortured us or executed us nearly as much as they have Jews.
    .
    “the central and revolutionary message of Faith alone, Word alone, and Christ alone trumps the rest.”
    .
    Is that really true? Can you get away with putting your own salvation above the welfare of others? That’s the sin of the two pious Jews who passed by on the other side. They chose ceremonial purity–to their own benefit–while ignoring a man who was on the verge of death.
    .
    Jesus made it clear that we can’t enter the kingdom of heaven if we don’t do God’s will, and he told us to love our neighbors. Can I run a valid church if it endorses hatred? Can I claim preaching salvation makes everything else I do okay? The conquistadors believed that.
    .
    Keeping “Luther” in the church’s name doesn’t prove they espouse hatred, but it honors someone who did, and it demonstrates remarkable insensitivity.