More M1 Insanity

November 19th, 2008

Hi-Tech for WWII Plinker

I am enjoying a tall glass of Red Rose tea, flavored with a magnificent Persian lime I grew myself. Don’t let anybody tell you store limes are as good as yard limes. Store limes are dry, and they’re not ripe.

I just checked Drudge. Apparently, the Obamas are starting a workout plan. Even though The Bums Won (to contradict the big Lebowski), they need to remember something. George Bush is a fitness nut who could mash pencil-necked B. Hussein like a pimple. Our President can beat up your President-Elect. I say that with all warmth and graciousfulness. And of course, hope.

This day is beginning well. For one thing, it was 53 degrees this morning. It’s funny how your attitude toward cool weather changes when you start working with tools and taking care of your yard. Sweat and the sun become your enemies. Perhaps the good Lord is preparing me emotionally for a move north, which I hope to make eventually. Yes, I will need help, adjusting to those frigid below-75 days I’ll have to endure in May, halfway up the state.

I think I’m going to go through with my M1 carbine plan. It’s an interesting experiment, and it may turn out to be a good home defense strategy, and it’s just plain fun. I’ll tell everyone how it works out. I’m also looking at M96 Mausers and M39 Finnish Mosins. Not sure why every gun name begins with “M.” I’d like to find an unissued Mosin, but I’m not sure where they come from or what the deal is. Are they really pre-WWII guns that somehow ended up in boxes, unopened, or are they just old guns with new stocks? I guess every M39 is old, in a way, because they’re remanufactured. But you know what I mean.

I’m going to slap a front grip on the M1, with a laser and light, just to see if it’s any good. I wonder how much the accuracy will suffer. I don’t think it will matter, because I plan to learn to shoot this thing without the sights.

A lot of people think you have to use sights to shoot, but that isn’t true. Sure, if you want pinpoint accuracy, sights matter. But when I was a kid, I used to shoot BB guns and air guns all the time without sights, and I had no problem hitting what I aimed at. And my grandfather once shot a rifled slug from the hip and took out a grouse in a distant tree; my dad saw it, and he still talks about it.

There is a famous video of a police officer being gunned down by a drunk veteran with an M1 carbine. If you watch it, you’ll notice the drunk did not use the sights. Yet he had no problem putting round after round exactly where he wanted. His shot placement was flawless. If he had used the sights, the officer might have had the time to kill him. To belabor the point, choosing not to use the sights made him more lethal, not less.

Navy SEALS practice shooting without sights. I don’t know what better recommendation you could want. Read Richard Marcinko’s book.

Besides…laser.

I don’t know anything about laser sights. I’m reading up. Evidently, you can get a very powerful green laser now for $43. I don’t understand much of the technical stuff, which is sad, because I took a semester of advanced optics in college, and I built temperature and current controllers for C02 lasers. I remember terms like “beam waist,” but that’s about it.

3 Responses to “More M1 Insanity”

  1. Leo Says:

    The key to the effective use of any weapon is practice. You need to find a place you can practice shooting in whatever style you think you need under the same conditions you would face if it were a real circumstance.

    You might consider getting a BB gun to practice your quick fire technique. You can make small targets to leave throughout the house with five gallon buckets with the opening covered with several layers of newspaper. As you walk through the house practice enaging different targets as you come across them.

    Only do this with the blinds closed and don’t talk too much about it.

  2. Tom A (Luger Guy) Says:

    The M designation stands for Model. Among European weapons prior to 1945, the designation after the M (As in M39) indicated the year of adoption by the Government that took the weapon into service.
    Post 1945, this rational system went up in smoke with the rise of NATO.

    Among US weapons, it is, of course a mish-mash; e.g. 45-70 Springfield M1873, M1903 Springfield, M1917 Enfield (actually manufactured by Remington and their Eddystone division) then comes the U.S.rifle, Caliber .30 M-1 (Actually the venerable 30-06 Springfield ) and the U.S. Carbine, caliber .30 carbine, Models M-1, M1-Ai, M-2 and M-3, followed by the U.S. Rifle, Caliber 7.62, M-14…I wonder what happened to all the Ms from M-1 through M-13? and then the U.S, Rifle,Caliber 5.56 mm, M-16.

    Confusing taxonomy, eh wot?

  3. Leo Says:

    The M2 .50 caliber machine gun is still in service, and I understand that a new lighter version that doesn’t have to have the head space and timing set is now becoming available.

    The M4 is the new more compact version of the M16A2. Currently in use by the US Army.

    All the other M numbers between M1 and M14 denote some type of weapon. I think most of them are rifles, except the M9, 9 mm Berreta which replaced the M1911 .45 caliber pistol.

Leave a Reply; Comments are Moderated and Not All Are Posted. Keep it Clean.