Stripes are for Fools’ Backs

This morning, I received a lot of disturbing information about the state of the world.

The thing that distressed me most was a report that Sir Ephraim Yitzchak Mirvis, the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth, had publicly stated that Orthodox Jewish parents should not be informed if their children come out as sexual perverts at school.

I took a look at a PDF of the Rabbi’s remarks, and this looks to be the money part:

All staff should be clear that a pupil coming out is not a safeguarding issue. They have simply shared an aspect of their identity. Like any other personal information, any information about staff or pupil sexuality or gender identity should be treated as confidential. Unless there is a risk of harm, this should not be disclosed to anyone, including their parents. Making a pupil’s parents aware of their child’s sexuality and gender identity can itself be a safeguarding risk, particularly as the school cannot know how parents or carers might react.

The rest of the PDF is a mix of Jewish tradition and law, the Gemara, a small amount of scripture, and leftist boilerplate.

It is reasonable to extract this conclusion from the above text: the Rabbi believes that when Jewish children tell their teachers about their issues with sexual perversion, which the Old Testament refers to as “abomination,” the teachers are to be trusted with handling the situations, and the Jewish Orthodox parents…are not.

Jewish scholars have twisted the scriptures a lot over the millennia, but so far, they have not tried to repeal them. It seems odd, then, that a Rabbi would show so little concern about extremely great sins. Also, the idea that parents should have less authority than teachers seems inconsistent with scripture, which gives Jews a lot of power over their children.

In the Old Testament, parents had all sorts of leeway when it came to deciding whom to bless and who inherited what. Also, Jephthah was allowed–required–to kill his innocent daughter as a result of a poorly-conceived vow. There is also a passage in Deuteronomy which authorizes parents, not rabbis or lawyers or kings, to execute their own children.

If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:

Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;

And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.

And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Jewish law is extremely complex, and it frequently produces conclusions that seem incompatible with the Bible. I suppose I should not be shocked to see yet another weird decision from a major rabbi. I don’t think Moses would be on board with it, however, nor do I think the God who burned Sodom approves.

The booklet containing Rabbi Mirvis’ strange recommendation was written in collaboration with leading Jewish Biblical scholars. Wait…no, it wasn’t. It was written in collaboration with leading pro-perversion activists. Check it and see. Strange bedfellows, no pun intended.

I had been under the impression that Orthodox Jews would be among the last holdouts in the battle against perversion, but it looks like they may be abandoning the field and leaving it to Spirit-led Christians and hard core Muslims.

I also read about a couple of naked parades.

To be fair, not everyone in the parades was entirely naked.

There were pro-perversion, pro-pride parades in New York and Toronto, and nude men and women marched and rode bicycles in full view of assembled crowds containing parents and minor children.

How did I end up in Bizarro World? How can this be happening? Even 25 years ago, this would have been impossible. If Earth were a person, I would want to check its ID.

I can’t make myself sit here and try to explain why nude homosexual parades are bad. It’s like telling people not to eat peanut butter and mercury sandwiches. If it’s not obvious, there is something wrong with you, and you can’t be made to understood.

In another story, pro-perversion people marched down a New York City street chanting, “We’re here! We’re queer! We’re coming for your children!”

What?

I guess they didn’t get Rabbi Mirvis’ memo. He doesn’t think our children belong to us. That is the position leftists take these days. It should be, “We’re here! We’re queer! We’re coming for the state’s children!”

Here’s a great question for leftists: if I have children, but they belong to the state, why is it that if I move to another country, I get to take them with me?

Do I also get to stroll into Fort Knox and fill my luggage with gold bars?

What do they mean when they say they’re coming for our children? Is it a joke? Do they mean they want to convert them to homosexuality and perform sex acts on them? Are they saying they will get our children to side with them, so we’ll die out and leave a pure rainbow world behind?

Has a judenrein sound to it.

It won’t really be a rainbow world, because the rainbow flag is gone. Confusion is increasing so quickly, there is now a new flag with a triangle of new colors next to the pole. There is also another flag with stripes in ugly colors. It is now literally impossible to say how many recognized genders there are.

A teacher in England recently told sane students feline was a gender. If your son decides he’s a cat, that’s his gender.

No one asked her whether it mattered if he was a male of female cat, but I guess that question would be transphobic.

Try and imagine what would have happened to a troop of perverts who marched in the most liberal city in the US 25 years ago and said they were coming for their opposition’s children. Even that recently, they might have required police help to escape without serious injuries.

Should I even mention the 18-year-old California girl who is suing her insane doctors for slicing her breasts off when she was THIRTEEN? This woman will never enjoy normal sex, if she manages to marry. She will never breastfeed. She will always feel like she is less than a woman. And why? Because idiot groomers on social media convinced her a childhood phase was a good basis for breast amputation.

Today a friend said he wondered when the world would reach the tipping point, meaning the point where things were so far gone, there was no longer any hope of recovery. I said I believed we had passed it some time ago.

This planet is done. There is no hope. Where do sane people go now?