Lesbians Lose the Right to Choose

I read a very disturbing story last night on a BBC site. Men who think they’re women are now exerting tremendous pressure on actual women to have sex with them, and rapes have been reported. That’s not all that shocking. What’s shocking is that many leftist women are on the side of the men.

The subject is upsetting and gross. I don’t know if sensitive people should read what I’m writing.

You would think men who try to become women would then want to have sex with men. You would expect them to be male homosexuals. It looks like that is often not the case. I don’t know what the majority of them want, but many expect women to desire them and fornicate with them, and they are targeting lesbians.

It’s a remarkable thing; men who haven’t had their penises removed are pressuring actual women to fornicate with them, based on their new imaginary status as women. Many leftists are backing them up, saying “genital preference” is bigotry. If a lesbian wants a woman without male organs, she’s a threat to emerging standards of gender and sexual behavior.

It gets worse. So many shemales are striking out with lesbians a new term has been coined. It’s sickening. The term is “cotton ceiling.”

We all know about the glass ceiling. Some women in the workforce say they can only rise so high. Once they get to a certain point, they say, they can see higher positions from where they are, but they can’t break through and reach them.

The cotton ceiling works the same way, except “cotton” refers to women’s underwear, and shemales are the ones who want to break through.

Could anything be more dehumanizing or disgusting? They make it sound like there are herds of resentful, entitled shemales out there, looking forward to a day when women will have to give them what they want.

Let’s think about women’s complaints about normal men who want to fornicate. They say many men feel entitled. They say they are coercive and often frightening. Lesbians, in particular, complain a lot about heterosexual men who don’t like to take “no” for an answer. They are tired of men who say, “Try it; you’ll like it.”

Now women are saying the same things about people who also claim to be women, and other women, real and fake, are saying the women who are complaining don’t have the right to say no.

How did we get here? Every time our strange new world presents a new curveball, that’s the question I hear myself asking.

Aren’t leftists feminists? Aren’t feminists pumped up about boundaries and a woman’s right to rule her own body? What happened to all that?

Leftist women are literally telling other women they are required to date and have sex with people they find physically repulsive. Who needs patriarchy? The matriarchy is going places where patriarchy doesn’t dare tread. The matriarchy is becoming the new rape culture.

You have to picture the scenarios that are taking place. Imagine a real woman, going on a guilt date with a man in a dress. The woman may weigh 110 pounds. The man may be six two and 220, muscular and fit because he works out and still has testicles, and he has the power and moral authority of woke on his side. Picture them alone in his apartment on a Friday night. How would you like to be her?

Then when sex occurs, through intimidation or plain old rape, other women side with the man.

These things are happening. It’s not a movie.

If I were single, no woman on Earth would say any other woman was obligated to “give me a chance.” No woman would say a lesbian was in the wrong for wanting nothing to do with my equipment. No woman would dream of telling another woman she was obligated to be attracted to me, date me, or fornicate with me. But put me in a dress, and all that changes?

Why?

Does every lesbian real woman also have to agree to date every other lesbian real woman? Do pretty lesbians have to have sex with fat, old, ugly lesbians? If not, why are shemales privileged?

If you want to see how insane leftist women have become, check out some quotations from the story I read.

I was told that homosexuality doesn’t exist and I owed it to my trans sisters to unlearn my ‘genital confusion’ so I can enjoy letting them penetrate me.

“[They] threatened to out me as a terf and risk my job if I refused to sleep with [them] . . . I was too young to argue and had been brainwashed by queer theory so [they were] a ‘woman’ even if every fibre of my being was screaming throughout so I agreed to go home with [them]. [They] used physical force when I changed my mind upon seeing [their] penis and raped me.

“They” comes from the article. It refers to a man. A terf is a feminist who isn’t on board with the notion that men are women. My guess: the victim wrote “he,” and the BBC “corrected” her.

Lesbians are still extremely scared to speak because they think they won’t be believed, because the trans ideology is so silencing everywhere.

saying “lesbians don’t date trans women because they are literally lesbians, they’re attracted to women, not men” is transphobic

what is genital preferences if not a fancy way of saying ‘i am transphobic’

I’m sorry if you’re going to be mad at this but yes it is transphobic to have a genital preference no ifs or ands about it nothing you say can change that

I thought I would be called a transphobe or that it would be wrong of me to turn down a trans woman who wanted to exchange nude pictures . . . Young women feel pressured to sleep with trans women ‘to prove I am not a terf’.

It truly appears that a pathetic, rejected man who is obsessed with sex and unable to get it honestly can buy makeup and women’s clothes and start getting action. All it takes is the mindset of a rapist.

I’m not defending lesbianism. That’s another issue. I’m saying no one has the right to choose someone else’s sex partner. No woman should have to choose between rape and cancellation.

What if we truly are seeing the emergence of a left-wing canon that says you have no right to turn down sex with perverts? That would be interesting from a historical context, because it happened in Sodom, and Jesus said he would return in times that were like the days of Sodom.

In the story of Lot’s rescue, two angels went to Sodom to look around. A gang of entitled homosexual men gathered in the street and insisted Lot send the angels out so they could be gang-raped. That is what we call “entitlement” in 2021. Entitlement is rising all around us, exactly unlike the creeping, barely noticeable rise in the levels of our oceans. If fake men are entitled to sex with unwilling lesbians, who is to say homosexual men are not entitled to sex with unwilling normal men?

After all, leftists say a woman who insists on a lover with real female parts is evil, transphobic, and guilty of genital preference. Doesn’t that mean normal men who also insist on real female parts are evil and homophobic? If a lesbian who refuses to have sex with a shemale is in the wrong, what about a man who won’t allow himself to be sodomized?

Suddenly, insisting on choosing your own partner is AGGRESSION. If that’s true, then isn’t rape self-defense?

We know male-on-male gang rape will probably become popular, simply because of the prediction Jesus made. Until this week, I didn’t see a social pathway to gang-rape victory. Now the bread crumbs are laid out. A year from now, we may be hearing about the anal ceiling.

I can’t see God leaving his reasonably faithful servants on this planet when Sodom-style mass violation becomes common. I think there are some things he would not let us suffer, just as he didn’t allow Jesus to suffer sexual mistreatment. Kenneth Copeland claims Jesus was molested by Roman soldiers, but then Kenneth Copeland is a liar whose ego has consumed his brain.

I wish the rapture would come today. Human behavior has become surreal.

A lot of people are applauding Dave Chappelle for refusing to stop making trans jokes. They’re misguided. I admit, when I saw that Chappelle said he would not be “summoned” or bow to shemales, I felt like rooting for him, but here is the truth: Dave Chappelle is nuts. He has serious mental problems. Chappelle is the guy who quit a popular show without warning and went into a mental hospital because he was offended by a racist skit he himself wrote and starred in.

You can tell Chappelle is crazy by looking at what he wears. He used to dress like a normal human being. The other day, he appeared in a weird green jumpsuit with “CHAPPELLE” printed on the breast in big yellow letters. It reminded me of the idiotic caped suits Elvis Presley wore after he lost his mind, or the ludicrous leather outfits Eddie Murphy started wearing when his ego went nova. It reminded me of Benny Hinn’s insane superhero pastor costume, which is a bizarre custom-made suit with no lapels and a dove sewn into it. Chappelle has lost touch with reality.

When he talks now, Chappelle is still pretty funny, but there are frequent Senator Palpatine moments in which he turns dark and imperious. I don’t know what’s in his future. Maybe he’ll go full-throttle Howard Hughes and surround himself with burly Mormon sycophants who shoot him up with morphine and rough up everyone who tries to talk to him.

Dave Chappelle isn’t against perversion. He supports it. He’s just against being told what to say. We shouldn’t mistake narcissism and the loss of the ability to self-monitor for character or moral soundness.

Anyone with a grain of common sense ought to see something wrong with a self-proclaimed Muslim who smokes his weight in weed every month and supports homosexuality and efforts to change gender. Lots of Muslims love sodomy and pedophilia, but only behind closed doors. Their public stance is quite different.

Chappelle isn’t a hero. He’s just a self-destructive entertainer who likes having his own way.