Ribs are Off the Menu
November 21st, 2020This is What Shopping Looks Like as the Antichrist Approaches
I finally did it. I broke down and ordered me a plate carrier.
A plate carrier is an unattractive vest that holds body armor plates. You can put four in, to protect you from all sides. It works great if you get shot where you happen to be covered by a plate, if you don’t mind broken ribs and so on. Unfortunately, many things most people consider important are not found in areas typically covered by plates.
The idea, I believe, is that it’s better to lose a part you don’t need to survive as long as your head remains alive. I’m not sure I agree, but that appears to be the philosophy.
Plates aren’t the whole picture. You have to get trauma pads. These are stiff foam pads that go behind the plates. When a bullet hits a plate, it may dent it, and it will definitely transmit energy to the person behind it. Pads are supposed to spread the impact out. I don’t know if they work. They look okay in Youtube videos people shoot behind their trailers.
You can also get ballistic helmets. I don’t like the word “ballistic.” It means nearly nothing. I would call them “anti-projectile” helmets. They’re not that great, in case you’re wondering. They’re supposed to be very good at protecting people from light shrapnel, but if you get shot in the head while wearing one, there is a good chance the bullet will go through OR it will push the helmet in so far, your skull will be broken. It’s still a lot better than the product most people wear in armed confrontations, which is nothing.
I don’t have a helmet. I felt like God wanted me to get armor, but I haven’t heard anything about helmets. That’s good, because a decent new one will run at least $450, and good luck finding one you can have in less than a month. You can get used military helmets for maybe $200, though.
Here’s the really sad thing about helmets: they’re disposable. At least the fancy plastic ones are. When a Kevlar helmet takes one shot, it pretty much shatters where the bullet hits it. The next round that hits in the same general area will not hit hard plastic. It will hit mushy broken plastic. The only remedy is a new helmet.
A couple of companies make steel helmets, but everyone makes fun of them. Not sure why. They’re just as light as plastic, they don’t push in nearly as much when they get shot, they don’t shatter when they get shot, and they work better around the edges. If you shoot a plastic helmet near an edge, it’s much more likely to let the bullet through. My best guess is that people hate steel helmets for the same reason people used to hate rifle scopes: a stupid, baseless resistance to change. But I don’t know much about the subject. It’s just an impression.
I was thinking it might be neat to have a thermal scope, in case Soros sends a busload of entitlement-minded, violent racists to my house at night. I could spot them hundreds of yards away, and they would have a pretty hard time getting close enough to me to fight back. Experts, however, say the in thing is a night vision monocular and an infrared laser. You put the monocular over one eye, you spot people in the dark, you light them up with a laser they can’t see, and then you light them up with something else.
It sounds pretty good, but I don’t think it would enable a person to hammer invaders from a really long distance. You wouldn’t see them until they were maybe a hundred yards off, and you would be in a lot of danger at that range.
Maybe the answer is a separate thermal doodad for picking up targets. You find them with it, and then you switch to night vision in order to deal with them. You could find an invader way off in the distance, which would be hard with night vision, and then once you knew where he was, you could use night vision to aim.
I don’t know. I’m just making up guesses using very limited information.
Okay; my guess was right. FLIR makes a product called the Breach. It’s a little monocular you can use to look around. And it’s dirt cheap. Only $2500. Let me check the couch cushions to see how much change I have.
A former Green Beret on Youtube says he carries a Breach for spotting, while backing it up with night vision. I guess I’m smarter than I thought.
Man, I would love to have a Breach. I could wander around my property locating critters for fun. But not $2500 worth of fun, I think.
It would be hell on coyotes and coons.
In the past, I have scoffed at people who talked about the need to be able to shoot bad guys at long distances. The main reason is that shooting a perp a long way off is nearly always murder. You can’t say you were reasonably afraid of great harm if you shot a guy with a knife a hundred yards away. But these are different times. These days, there is a real possibility that armed groups with very clear intentions might menace people from a hundred yards or more, leaving no practical way to avoid fighting. If 10 “protestors” with rifles start coming toward you from a long way off, and you know who they are and why they’re there, you can’t just wait until they get close enough to make police investigators happy. You have to start shooting while they’re still at a disadvantage.
The price of a night vision monocular is not far from the price of a Breach. I’m not sure why night vision monoculars cost so much. I bought a night vision scope for $600, from a company that also makes highly regarded monoculars. Anyway, if you wanted thermal for spotting and night vision for closing the deal, you would be looking at the price of a good used car.
It’s cheaper than a funeral, granted. But a lot of intelligent, informed people expect to do well with a $500 AR-15 and three or four mags full of ball ammo. Kyle Rittenhouse had no armor, no helmet, and no weird optics, and he successfully battled a large crowd of vicious armed aggressors bent on murdering him in the street. He killed two, maimed one, scared the rest off, and didn’t damage property or hurt the innocent.
I don’t know why I find this stuff interesting. Christianity is primarily about love. I really can’t see myself shooting anyone. Sometimes you want to be able to do a thing even if you don’t want to do it. I would be highly disturbed if I hurt anyone, even to protect innocent life, but the knowledge that I can hurt the wicked is still comforting.
November 23rd, 2020 at 10:32 AM
My Plate Carrier is a Level III-A Kevlar vest, with pockets fore and aft for said plates. Plates work better when backed by such.
Throw a lightweight “tactical” vest over that to carry six pMags, blowout kit, flashlight and spare pistol mags, camelback-type water pouch on the back, and I’m kitted-up about as heavy as I care to be.
I could probably use a good Kevlar helmet, but lacking such, my ancient Boonie Hat will have to just solider along, as always.
Jim
Sunk New Dawn
Galveston, TX
November 23rd, 2020 at 11:10 AM
I’m trying to figure out what to do about magazines. I’ve read that you don’t want them on your chest because they make it impossible to lie down. Some recommend belts.
I am starting to resign myself to the idea that the AR-15 would have to be the weapon of choice if I were outdoors. Putting optics on formerly communist weapons doesn’t seem easy.
I do not trust .223, but this is not the time to start thinking about .300 Blackout and a new barrel.
November 23rd, 2020 at 4:43 PM
The rate of twist in your 5.56/.223 barrel is for the most part, the determinant of what bullet-weight is going to work best out of your rifle.
If you have the older 1:9 twist, you’re pretty much stuck with 55 grain stuff. 1:8 will be happy with 62 & 69 grain Match rounds. 1:7 can do those well, and also get you to the 77 grain stuff that is tailored to maximize the ballistic coefficient of the projectile.
Point I’m making here, is that the 5.56/.223 can do “better than expected” in a great many circumstances. I do think many folks don’t effect enough care in matching their ammo to their bore, with resultingly sad results.
Same goes to matching the bullet to the intended terminal effect. 55. gr. rounds are good hog medicine if you’re making nothing but brain shots. But I don’t expect they’d do as well when trying to punch through the shoulder gristle of some old boar. 69 gr. Hoginator rounds though? Like magic.
Vietnam era M-16 had that 1:12 bore, which *barely* stabilized the 55 gr. slug. And so when it hit a person, it would upset instantly, wildly and with dramatic effect. It was a meat-destroyer of epic proportions, but if it hit so much as a spider-web in flight, that was IT for that round.
In Iraq & Afghanistan, they experienced the opposite. The 62 gr. green-tips were *so* stabilized, they just punched .223 diameter holes through Achmed, without doing much damage beyond just that hole.
Not a whole lot of terminal shock being transmitted with those, unless the shooter was lucky enough for the bullet to hit some larger bones on it’s way through.
My AR has a 1:8 twist, with a .223 Wylde chamber dimension. It really, really likes the Federal Gold Match 69 gr. loading. It also really likes a 2950 ftp. handload with 69gr. Speer Game King bullets. Both are about .7 MOA regulars.
But I can’t get better than a 1.5″ group with PMC Bronze, 55 gr. FMJs.
I don’t sense a need to change out a .300 Blk, as I’m pleased with the overall performance of this AR as built.
Oh, and yep. I remember reading about that mag issue on the chest rig, but I’m glad you reminded me. Kept me from spending some unnecessary fundage. Waist-belt & carrier it is, then.
Jim
Sunk New Dawn
Galveston, TX
November 23rd, 2020 at 5:24 PM
My other main problem with the AR is the gun itself. Any gun which is “100% reliable provided you take care of it correctly” has problems. No one ever makes that excuse about an AK-47.
As for ammo, someone tipped me off to an insane deal on something which is about the same as 55-grain Hornady TAP Urban, so I am very well stocked with it. I didn’t buy it for defense, but I suppose it will do the job most of the time.
Maybe I should get a lighter upper for the LR-308 for defensive use, just because I can. I ended up with a large amount of 165-grain hunting ammo I never expect to use.