When Cyrus Met Brutus

January 2nd, 2019

Romney Shanks Trump in Hopeless Bid for Another Failed Candidacy

Mitt Romney has done something interesting. He has written an extremely divisive opinion piece in which he undermines his party’s incumbent president by claiming the president is a divisive person who undermines America’s position.

Ordinarily, one expects a president’s party members to back him up in the lead-up to a reelection campaign. Romney has done the opposite. He has decided to give the left a big torpedo to aim at Trump’s hull.

Romney cannot be elected. He needs to knock it off. He belongs to a fringe religion which is unpopular with a large percentage of Christian voters, and the GOP can’t seat a president without strong Christian support. Romney is the proverbial dog in the manger; he can’t eat the straw, but he is willing to sit in the manger and bite anyone else who tries to eat.

Obama, a weak president, beat Romney by about 4 percentage points in 2012, and there is no reason at all to think he will do better against a more competent Democrat in 2020. The same Christians who snubbed him in 2012 will snub him again, and he has already proven incapable of converting Democrats. On top of all that, having lost one election already, he is, correctly, perceived as a loser. He probably can’t even get the nomination.

Romney’s presidential campaign will flop. He can’t do himself any good, but he might damage Trump and the US. He may help a socialist kook get elected. If Elizabeth Warren makes it to the Oval Office, we may have Mitt Romney’s selfishness to thank.

It really is selfishness. Trump can win in 2020, and Romney knows it. He also knows there are other candidates who can draw more votes than he can. He knows he is rolling the dice with America’s future, in order to hang one more title around his own neck.

He also chose to go negative right out of the starting blocks. That’s startling, coming from a Republican. He could have promoted himself without trying to kneecap Trump.

Romney’s attack is surprisingly harsh. He goes so far as to call Trump a racist. This is shocking behavior from a so-called Republican. There are liberal commentators who won’t go that far.

Trump has never shown any sign of true racism. He stated, correctly, that Mexico sends us criminals. Correctly but tactlessly, he criticized African countries with appalling, completely self-inficted standards of living. He has worked to secure our borders against all illegitimate visitors regardless of race. Those things don’t make him a racist, and Mitt Romney knows it. Romney has shown that he is willing to abandon honesty and sink to the level of a Michael Moore or a Kathy Griffin, in hopes of launching another hopeless campaign of his own.

Romney wants to get America back on the one-world government bandwagon. Look at this snippet:

Trump’s words and actions have caused dismay around the world. In a 2016 Pew Research Center poll, 84 percent of people in Germany, Britain, France, Canada and Sweden believed the American president would “do the right thing in world affairs.” One year later, that number had fallen to 16 percent.

Let’s think about that. Trump has upset people “around the world.” Isn’t that a little vague? He has upset some people, but he has pleased others. He has definitely upset some of our enemies. Isn’t that a sign that he’s putting us first? When the Chinese are happy with America’s president, it’s not a good sign.

Romney thinks it matters what Canadians and Western Europeans think about our president. Here’s an interesting fact: Trump isn’t their president. He’s not their advocate, either. He is the president of the United States, and he’s supposed to support us against our allies as well as our enemies. Trump wants to put an end to the obscene leeching our allies subject us to. Naturally, that would upset them. It will cost them money. It’s also important to point out that the nations Romney mentions are farther to the left than the USA. Wouldn’t it be a little odd if their citizens liked Trump more than Obama?

Obama went around the world bowing to people and apologizing for America. It was repulsive. Trump is willing to step on foreign toes in order to get us better deals. I’m all for that. I’m an American. I’m not Swedish or French. I want my president to help Americans first. Once he has looked after our interests, he can consider the problems of foreigners who don’t live here, pay taxes, or serve in our military.

Romney says, “The world needs American leadership, and it is in America’s interest to provide it.” That was true during World War Two and the Cold War. Is it really true now? Do we want to be the world’s unpaid policeman forever? The threat of a communist takeover is gone. We’re going socialist from inside now; we don’t have to worry about Russian tanks moving in.

Putin is aggressive, but he is not an imperialist. The Chinese have absorbed a few nations in their realm, and they have a completely legitimate claim to Taiwan, but they have never had any plans to conquer the world. Do we really care if countries like Venezuela cuddle up to Putin instead of us? They are not coming after us.

Japan committed widescale atrocities in China, but the Chinese don’t want to take over Japan. They haven’t taken over Korea, even though North Korea gives them headaches. They didn’t take over Vietnam, even though their proxies won.

Putin wants Ukraine, which is a Russian-speaking nation that borders Russia, but we don’t see him trying to rebuild the Berlin Wall or restore Russian control of Poland.

“American leadership” is expensive, and it inevitably involves actions bordering on imperialism. Here’s a thought: maybe if they know we’re not eager to wipe their noses and break up their fights, other countries will find other ways to solve their problems. Revolutionary, I know.

Donald Trump is coarse. He lies a lot, albeit about trivial things no one really cares about (life goes on regardless of how many people attended his inauguration). He is a serial adulterer. He runs casinos. He can’t admit fault. He is thin-skinned. He insults people unnecessarily. I know all that, and ordinarily, he’s not a person I would feel compelled to defend. He and his family have been attacked so unfairly and dishonestly for so long that I can’t help wanting to say something once in a while. It’s strange to find myself in this position.

Romney has disgraced himself with his selfishness and treachery, but I wonder if anyone will realize it. Will conservatives who worry about 2020 support Romney’s fragging attempt and put together a drive to replace Trump?

Back when Obama was on the way out, everyone knew Joe Biden was too eccentric to win. It was reported that Biden was called to the Oval Office and informed that the Democrats would not support him, and that Hillary was to be anointed. We don’t know if this really happened, because the Democrats, in what will surely be the only instance in history, had more class than Mitt Romney. Obama didn’t write a piece for the newspapers, tearing Biden down over known issues like exhibitionism, plagiarism, and instability. Whatever happened happened behind closed doors.

How can it be that we have reached a point where Democrats behave better than Republicans?

I truly hope we won’t be dumb enough to step on the same landmine twice. We let leftists and a misguided desire for unity drive our terrible choices in 2008 and 2012. We are unquestionably stupid enough to do it again.

We can do so much better than Romney. Cruz or Paul would be fine, and they are both electable. Romney is like Jeb Bush; he could walk on water and still lose.

I know what Trump is. I don’t support him for that. I support him for what he does. I wish he were a mature, well-mannered man who inspired respect in his personal life. He’s not. He is still a finer person than Hillary Clinton, and his agenda is much closer to the will of God.

4 Responses to “When Cyrus Met Brutus”

  1. Steve B Says:

    I’m not sure how you figure communist China has a legitimate claim on Taiwan, the last bastion of nationalist China that wasn’t absorbed into the great Maoist collective. They talk about “one China,” which basically just means they want to finish what they started, and Taiwan isn’t too keen on the idea. Understandably.

    As far as Romney goes, you almost have to think he’s watched the relative success the Frothing Progs have had dehumanizing Trump in the press, and so he figured go with what works? He may, however, forgotten that if you feed the alligator, it just eats you last.

  2. Steve H. Says:

    The entire South rebelled, and the consensus today is that the North was right to conquer us and force us back into the union. We take that position and then claim China doesn’t have the right to recover an island which was part of China longer than the antebellum South was part of America.

    If America went hardcore conservative, and Hawaii broke off and claimed to be the real USA, we would lose our minds if the Chinese tried to keep us from taking it back. We are obligated to send arms to Taiwan for use against China. Imagine the Chinese sending arms to Hawaii to be used to kill American soldiers and sailors.

    I’m all for Taiwan’s freedom, but I think it would be a huge mistake to send our military personnel to keep Taiwan capitalist. China was militarily weak in the past, but now we can’t push them around, and they could do us a great deal of harm. It seems like a big sacrifice to make in order to meddle in an internal dispute.

    Our Cold War efforts in Asian nations that went communist were driven by the reasonable fear that the entire world would be conquered, but that concern is long gone, and Taiwan really is part of China.

  3. Steve B Says:

    Taiwan didn’t rebel. It’s where the remnants of Chaing Kai Shek’s Republic of China nationalist forces retreated to when Mao’s communist “revolution” pushed them off the continent.

    A better analogy would be that the South WON the Civil war, and pushed north all the way to the Canadian border. The last remnants of the Northern American Army and thousands of displaced Northerners retreated to, say, Nova Scotia (pretend it belonged to the US), and were able to hold out. And for the next 60 years the South vowed to “reunite” the US and “reclaim” Nova Scotia.

  4. Steve H. Says:

    The question of whether Taiwan rebelled isn’t important; rebellion is something I mentioned as background in the story of the Civil War. Nonetheless, refusing to accept the government of China is certainly rebellious. The Taiwanese have refused to acknowledge the legitimate government of China, which, in spite of its repugnant nature, has the fervent support of the majority of the Chinese people. The communists are the true rulers of China, and Taiwan is part of China.

    Internet sources say the government of Taiwan claims it’s the real government of China. That’s delusional. The people don’t recognize them, and neither do other countries. It’s not like they’re going to return to the mainland and rule. They are permanently defeated.

    If, in your analogy, the South had the people of the United States solidly behind it, the people who refused to accept the new regime wouldn’t be the legitimate rulers any more.

    I’m not going to host an endless comment debate on Taiwan. If you believe China has no claim on Taiwan, that’s fine, but it’s a peripheral issue. China is not planning to take over the world. That’s the point. It’s unquestionably true, and it’s silly for us to hold onto Cold War policies that no longer make any sense and may put our lives at risk.

Leave a Reply; Comments are Moderated and Not All Are Posted. Keep it Clean.