What Lot’s Wife Saw

August 2nd, 2018

Tide of Filth Continues to Rise

I’m not sure why I still look at the news at all. For a while, I really cut back, but I started to drift back into it after God showed me a few things, and now I read a fair amount. I can’t say it’s as damaging as it used to be, but it’s still gross and unpleasant.

Today’s menu: the destructive perpetuation of black victimhood politics, the promotion of outright hatred for white people, and a famous actress pushing the delusional notion that comments from actresses will cause men to find overweight women attractive.

I can probably find an article about “slut-shaming,” too, if I look for a few seconds. “Principal gives braless teen detention; Twitter isn’t having it.” Something like that has to be in there somewhere. The left has decided that young girls, who are not to be objectified sexually, are empowering themselves when they do everything humanly possibly to assure that they are…objectified sexually. And teachers and principals who object are somehow out of line.

Let’s see. “White privilege” article. I’m still waiting for my weekly Caucasian stipend check. “Whitewashing” article. White people are no longer allowed to use chopsticks in movies, I think. Not sure.

Well, I don’t see any new articles about spoiled girls in tube tops, but I did see this, from a well-known, big-time outlet: “Trump’s Matter-of-Fact Fascism.”

What?

I’m wondering if the person who wrote that headline has any idea what has happened under real fascist regimes. I also wonder if they understand that the biggest purveyors of fascism are leftists. The term “fascism” is not tied to the right or left wing. It’s very vague. It refers to all governments that are oppressive and cruel.

Think about this: China and the USSR. Game over. If right-wing fascists did their best to promote their ethos, starting today, and they succeeded beyond their fondest hopes, it would be decades before they caught up with the big dogs.

I’m not sure right-wing fascist can even exist. Right-wing people support freedom of contract, freedom of religion, capitalism, private property, and the right to own and carry guns. How can you reconcile those things with fascism? Leftists, on the other hand, believe in socialism, central control of all wealth, disarmament of all citizens, and tightly regulated trade. How can you have those things without fascism? Cuban is a fascist state. So is North Korea. So is Nicaragua. So is Vietnam. So is Burma. Hmm.

I have to point out a few things.

Unattractive women are going to remain unattractive regardless of how many Yahoo Lifestyle articles criticize men who find unattractive women unattractive. Even if I wanted to find Melissa McCarthy attractive, I could not make myself do it. And I don’t want to. I don’t want to, and there is no reason why I should try.
God made some people desirable, and he also made the others. That’s how things are. Some people are smart. Some people are talented. Some people are charismatic. Some people were born with a huge genetic edge over the rest of us. Part of maturity is accepting what you are and refusing to blame other people for treating you…wait for it…appropriately.

I don’t understand why leftists want to force men to like unattractive women. When did this become a legitimate, useful project?

Where is the movement to force women to be attracted to short men and unsuccessful men? Can I have an update on that? Women say men are shallow because we like beautiful women, yet men under a certain height find it very hard to get dates, even if they’re real catches. Men who don’t earn a lot have trouble landing women, too. How come no one ever bemoans the loneliness of Gary Coleman and Vern Troyer? Maybe it’s because women who reject short and unsuccessful men aren’t doing anything wrong.

The rules of attraction are what they are. It’s not wrong, and it’s not a conspiracy.

Men–even men who are not attractive–prefer attractive women. They always will. People like chocolate bars better than liver. People like silk better than burlap. There is no use raging against things that can’t be changed, and using inalterable conditions of life to justify tormenting innocent people is immoral and cruel.

As for black victimhood politics, all I can say is that it’s a great strategy for making potential employers look for ways to reject you without inviting lawsuits. If, before you even start to work, you have a chip on your shoulder and an entitlement attitude, plus some overt racism, your resume is going to the bottom of the pile, and that’s not discrimination. That’s common sense. No one wants to hire a lawsuit time bomb.

Spoiled girls in tube tops…where do I begin? Men look at women. It’s not because we’re pigs. It’s biological. If we could turn it off, a lot of us would. I certainly would. I’ve learned to avoid sexual provocation; I don’t encourage my own desires. It leads to spiritual problems, and I don’t like being controlled by sleazy women with IQ’s that resemble my house’s thermostat settings.

Stop blaming us for something we can’t control. You are not helping. But then women who tempt men aren’t trying to help. They’re looking for power and an excuse to cause suffering.

It’s disrespectful and thoughtless to expose yourself at school or at your job, and it makes you look like a bimbo, which, if you do expose yourself, you probably are. Boys going through puberty need all the help they can get, and dressing like a whore in order to get attention from boys, and in order to control them, is not something a quality person does. School administrators realize this, and if they tell you to put on a longer skirt and stop showing your underwear (if you are thoughtful enough to wear underwear), it’s not oppression. It’s sound educational policy, and it’s also in your best interest.

Being thought of as a whore will curtail your social and employment opportunities, and it will eventually lead to misery. If you want to peak in 11th grade, slut it up, but in a couple of years, you will be an object of ridicule.

Slutty women have no idea how people talk about them when they’re not around. That’s too bad.

When I was in college, I visited Georgia Tech with a friend. We stayed in a frat house. The frat guys had a sort of mascot. I have no idea what her name was, because they called her “the whore.” She was a student. She was a cute little blond girl. She liked hanging around with the boys. When she was present, they treated her nicely because she provided a service. When she was out of the room, they would say things like, “Where’s the whore?” She probably never found out. This is what life is really like when you’re promiscuous and provocative.

One of the reasons I visited was that I thought I was in love with a girl who went to Emory. My friend got to Georgia Tech a few days before I did, and being the kind of friend he was, he invited her for a visit and made out with her. At one point she had quite a few drinks and sat on some bleachers above the guys, and she did not sit in a ladylike manner. When they looked up, they saw a lot more than they needed to. From then on, she had a secret nickname, too, and it’s too crude to mention here. The implication was that she omitted her undergarments and displayed her privates. My friend (someone I ejected from my circle years later) would probably still use that nickname today if we discussed her.

It’s not easy for a provocative woman to get respect from men or anyone else. She may get tolerance, and she may intimidate with social pressure, but she can’t get respect.

Incidentally, I say “dressing like a whore” with considerable forethought. I’ve seen how actual whores dress. Many mainstream women and girls of 2018 dress the way prostitutes dressed in 1995, and this is especially true of celebrities. Leftist heroin Chrissy Teigen appeared on TV wearing a dress that exposed her genitals and then made fun of people who were upset.

“Whitewashing”…who cares? Is it really a big deal if Tom Cruise stars in a movie about samurais? Is it going to bring back railroad coolie camps? I don’t think so. All movies are silly, when you get right down to it. Actors hate hearing that, but it’s true. It’s maladjusted, angry people playing make-believe. We make too much of it.

No one minds “blackwashing.” Well, that’s not entirely true. I thought it was weird when people talked about hiring Idris Elba to play James Bond. He’d do a bang-up job, but James Bond is half Scottish and half Swiss, and he has always been played by white men, so watching Idris Elba play him would be like sitting through a pointless, carping lecture which would go completely against the politically incorrect underpinnings of the James Bond universe. It would be like going to a Stones concert and having Keith Richards stop the show and give a lecture on temperance.

I think Tom Hardy will be the next James Bond. Who else could follow Daniel Craig? And he’s young enough to make an investment in him worthwhile. Idris Elba is pushing 50.

Anyway, no one cared when Denzel Washington played the Equalizer, a character that was originally white. No one cared when Jaden Smith played the Karate Kid. It’s hard to believe people get agitated about things like this.

What was I referring to when I mentioned hatred of white people, above? I was talking about a woman named Sarah Jeong. I assume she’s Korean. The New York Times (which really is failing, as the president says) hired her the other day. Problem: she has a bunch of fairly recent racist tweets. And they’re not mild. They’re not “arguably” racist. They are worse than most of the things Nazis said about Jews. At least the Nazis pretended to have reason on their side.

You can go look the tweets up. I am not going to quote them.

Her excuse is that she was being provoked by vicious racist tweets aimed at her. Does that really fly? No. If a Jewish extremist tweets that all gentiles are monkeys, it’s still not okay for me to call him a kike or say Hitler was right. It doesn’t work that way. Even if it did, why did she leave the tweets up for two years? No, that dog won’t hunt.

People are defending her. That’s disturbing.

God told me something a while back. He said, “The hate is already here.” He was referring to the hate that will eventually cause mainstream Americans to torment and murder Christians. For some reason, leftists conflate Christians and white people, so Jeong’s bizarre tweets appear to be symptomatic of the hate God was telling me about.

It’s scary that she was tolerated for two years after tweeting these things, but it’s a helpful warning, too. Buy guns if you want. Buy a plot of land in Idaho and learn to grow your own food. Can’t hurt. But what you really need is to get close to God and learn how to get his protection. Guns and homegrown carrots won’t be the best answers when things get really bad. Carnal tools have never been the best choice.

Leftists, some of them prominent, now use the Internet to call for the slaughter of conservatives, whites, and Christians. It’s just words now (unless you get beaten up for wearing a red hat), but what people need to understand is that the tweeters and Instagrammers aren’t kidding or bluffing. They are fully willing to do what they say should be done. They are being restrained right now, but that won’t always be true.

People do what they’re given permission to do. When the government and our famous bellwethers give Americans permission, we will be beaten and killed, wholesale. Don’t think for a second that Americans are above it. Americans can be just as vicious, sadistic, and self-righteous as anyone else, when they lose touch with God.

I’m glad I moved to the country, but as long as I’m on this planet, I will never be far from the kooks and crazies. Ever notice how many leftist-nut stories come from Texas? Texans are WAY overrated. They will lie down for just about anything these days. They hire all sorts of poisonous educators now, and when there’s a conflict, they roll over and play dead. How did that happen?

I’m glad I’m not closer to the flames, but I haven’t escaped. I’m just retreating and enjoying temporary cover. If you think you’re doing better, you’re out of touch with reality.

The Bible says that if riches increase, we should not set our hearts on them. It’s the same way with everything that belongs to the earth. Our bodies. Our nation. It’s all temporary. I no longer feel attached to this life. I can’t wait to leave. I am not depressed, and I would never even think about suicide, but I know this place is messed up. I’m like a Peace Corps volunteer who can’t wait to come home from Sudan.

I look forward to being out of the reach of leftists and violent crusaders forever. I look forward to being surrounded with like-minded brothers and sisters in perfect, immortal bodies. I look forward to not needing reading glasses any more, now that I think about it.

Northern Florida is a glimmer of the life to come. I see very little hostility or disagreement here. I experience a lot of warmth and kindness. I hear people talking about God, without shame or reluctance. Heaven will be like this, only many times better. If they had an Internet in heaven, it wouldn’t be polluted by the sordid antics of Kim Kardashian and Chrissy Teigen. It would be full of love and agreement.

I feel like I’m in a lifeboat, watching the Titanic sink. I can’t do one thing to stop it. All I can do is pull people aboard.

I guess I’ll close now. I need to go catch up on pithy articles about society’s great need to promote topless breastfeeding in restaurants.

6 Responses to “What Lot’s Wife Saw”

  1. Steve B Says:

    All too true. I probably spend more time on the news sites than I should, but I think I fear being uniformed, caught unawares, more than I fear a hardened heart. I know that the news is a “distillation,” of things, and that it appears more concentrated than it probably is. And yet, the fact that so many of these things exist AT ALL, is worrisome in the extreme. Whether it’s the rise of Ocasio (the next neatly-packaged Obama) or the alacrity with which so many social-justice warriors will crucify people in the name of tolerance, it’s a distrubing world. But like you say, our hope is not found in this world.

  2. Monty James Says:

    It might be possible to recast “The Equalizer”, but Denzel Washington? Laughable. Edward Woodward was great in that show.

  3. Ed Bonderenka Says:

    Great post.
    I find myself agreeing with Steve B.

  4. musical mountaineer Says:

    Not everything on the Internet is bad for you:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9S43CKjIGVg

  5. Steve H. Says:

    Today’s “slut-shaming” scoop: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/harassed-kicked-teen-says-booted-alabama-mall-shorts-231716075.html

  6. Chris Says:

    “When she was present, they treated her nicely because she provided a service. When she was out of the room, they would say things like, “Where’s the whore?” She probably never found out. This is what life is really like when you’re promiscuous and provocative.”

    It’s universal, too. When I went through tech school during my time in the Air Force, there were three promiscuous girls in my squadron known as “The Petting Zoo” who became infamous for going to “hotel parties” and having sex with the male Airmen. The guys called them “The Horse,” “Bulldog,” and “The Lion King” because of their looks. Supposedly there was even a sex tape of one of them going around the squadron. Like the frat boys, they were nice to them when they were around, but they didn’t consider these girls to be anything other than whores.

Leave a Reply; Comments are Moderated and Not All Are Posted. Keep it Clean.