Give Till it Hurts Obama
Saturday, November 1st, 2008I am Relaxed
I think we are going to win this one.
John McCain is ahead of Obama in Zogby’s latest poll. Republicans almost always do better than the polls suggest. Republican turnout will be great, because we are more afraid of Obama than Democrats are of John McCain. And I can’t believe God would give us a socialist President who has announced his willingness to divide up Jerusalem. And the pride and smugness we’re seeing from Obama and those in the media who unethically supported him and smeared McCain and Palin…is it even possible that God would reward these people with victory? Such things happen, but to me, it looks like a humbling moment in the making.
I have been feeling relaxed about the election for quite some time. It’s strange, considering how I felt in 2000 and 2004. And it doesn’t mean I’m sure McCain will win. I generally have more serenity in my life these days, and I guess the effect applies to politics. That makes sense. After all, security and prosperity come to each individual from God, not from Uncle Sam or from the individual’s own efforts. So I am not afraid that my life will be difficult if Obama wins.
Obama is really exposing his inner socialist these days. First there was the Joe the Plumber moment. Now he’s calling people who want reasonable taxes “selfish.” Unbelievable. As Mike Huckabee says, wanting to spend your own money on your family is not selfish. It’s normal and healthy and righteous. It’s what human beings are supposed to do. Socialism, on the other hand, is clearly evil and cannot be implemented without a move toward totalitarianism.
When a government decides to take wealth from productive people and pass it around, it has to give itself new, unnatural powers in order to get the job done. It has to be able to locate wealth, and it has to be able to identify what it perceives as need, and it has to decide who deserves the money it has forcibly confiscated from working people. A small, limited government can’t do those things. To get those things done, the government will have to diminish our privacy and our property rights, and it will have to employ a lot of bureaucrats to stick their nose in our business and decide who gets what. A socialist America (truly socialist, I mean) will be like Cuba or any other socialist state. There will be boards and agencies manned by cronies of the chief executive, and they will funnel loot and power to their buddies before thinking about the public good. That’s how socialism works. Jesse Jackson has a history of going to meet CEOs and saying, “We have to get rid of this meritocracy.” That is literally the way he says it; no paraphrasing. Under socialism, government bureaucrats by the tens of thousands will be paid to say the same thing, as policy. When merit no longer determines compensation, other measures have to be used. And that means empowering bureaucrats to decide what the measures are, and to do the measuring. That’s the Obama plan.
I know these things already happen in our government, which is somewhat socialist in its present form. But it can get much, much worse.
By the way, let’s not forget: prior to 2005, Obama and his America-bashing, handler-muzzled wife gave less than one percent of their income to charity. When he got a ridiculous advance for the race-baiting book Bill Ayres probably wrote for him, they went up to between five and six percent. And those figures are deceptively favorable to Obama; they include donations to his church, which are not charitable at all. Church donations and charitable donations are different things.
When it comes to giving, observant Jews and Bible-believing Christians typically START at ten percent; that’s a baseline. And they make up a big portion of the “selfish” hordes that support John McCain. Obama doesn’t begin to measure up. Joe Biden is also incredibly stingy in this regard. So was Gore. So was Clinton. Then there’s Dick Cheney, who gives a colossal, multimillion-dollar portion of his income to charity. Bad, evil Dick Cheney. Giving more per month than the Obamas, Bidens, Clintons, and Gores do, combined, in a decade. Once again, I have to ask: isn’t he supposed to be greedy and full of hate? If he is, how come Al Gore’s giving amounts to a tiny fraction of one percent of Cheney’s? Pope Prius I is not living up to expectations.
We all know conservatives give more than liberals, as a general rule, even as we complain about high taxes. We’re not complaining because we want to hoard our money. We’re just asking for the right to decide whom to give it to, instead of putting the decision in the hands of godless bureaucrats who reward laziness, perversion, dishonesty, and other evil traits. We know that private citizens do a better job of just about everything, and that includes giving.
Call me crazy, but to me, it seems like selfishness when you vote for a candidate because you want him to take other people’s money and give it to you. Am I missing something?
I think every conservative should learn to give. There have been years when I’ve been a real miser, and I am ashamed of it. Federal Express’s Fred Smith used to say no company got a union unless it deserved it. Countries are probably the same way. If we don’t give on our own, maybe we’ll be punished with a government that does it for us.
Anyway, I am optimistic and relaxed.
Don’t forget to vote, and make your friends vote, too.