{"id":4087,"date":"2009-08-10T09:38:54","date_gmt":"2009-08-10T14:38:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/?p=4087"},"modified":"2009-08-10T10:14:21","modified_gmt":"2009-08-10T15:14:21","slug":"obamas-pet-comes-calling-for-scraps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/?p=4087","title":{"rendered":"Obama&#8217;s Pet Comes Calling for Scraps"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>DENIED<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I just received a phone call that offended me. <\/p>\n<p>The American Bar Association wanted me to rejoin. I shut them down fast. I said they were too liberal for me, and that they should give me a call when they ceased being a political organization.<\/p>\n<p>This bit of pandering filth is from their own website: &#8220;The ABA opposes federal, state or territorial legislation to create special legal immunity for the firearms industry from civil tort liability.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That, all by itself, is sufficient reason to oppose these overweening social engineers. You can find plenty of other reasons if you Google.<\/p>\n<p>I joined the ABA when I was in law school, to get substantial discounts on a few things I needed. Bar-prep classes. Bar exams are idiotic; the ABA accredits law schools AND helps write bar exams. Does that make sense to you? &#8220;We vouch for this school, but we want to subject its graduates to an overly difficult test which bears almost no relationship to practice or to the materials they learned in school, to make sure they&#8217;re qualified to take entry-level jobs where they sit around looking at Westlaw all day.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One of two things has to be true. The ABA&#8217;s accreditation is garbage, or the tests are unnecessary.<\/p>\n<p>Very often, money explains this kind of foolishness. That&#8217;s probably the case here. It is virtually impossible to pass the Florida bar exam without a prep course. The crap on the test is not substantially related to the material taught in law schools, and you can&#8217;t pick it up in practice. So you have to spend thousands of dollars and waste months preparing. Where do the thousands go? Down here, they go to a company called Bar\/Bri. It&#8217;s a great thing for them. No one else can get you through the test, and the test is mandatory. They could charge ten thousand dollars, and people would have to pay it. My guess&#8211;and it&#8217;s only a guess&#8211;is that Bar\/Bri has been known to spend money cozying up to bar associations, to make sure this silliness continues. A lawyer who can make his &#8220;educational&#8221; services indispensable can become wealthy without ever entering a courtroom. That&#8217;s a fantastic temptation.<\/p>\n<p>If law schools are producing people who can&#8217;t practice&#8211;and they are&#8211;the answer isn&#8217;t a redundant test. The answer is accreditation that means something. Law schools accept truly inept people because of affirmative action or because they have pull, and the result is a substantial number of graduates who are beyond hope. At my school, they flew affirmative action recipients to another state before their freshman years, to teach them in advance and give them a patently unfair jump on the rest of us. And a lot of these people still washed out or could not pass the bar exam or could not keep jobs because they simply did not have the mental horsepower to do the work. The others didn&#8217;t need the costly cheat, so it was a waste.<\/p>\n<p>There was never any doubt that I would be able to practice law. That is true of the majority of law school graduates. It&#8217;s wrong to subject us to expensive tests, wasting months of our productive years, to weed out the people who were admitted and passed because of bogus accreditation. If a law school produces substantial numbers of graduates who can&#8217;t do the work, that law school should not be accredited. Aside from that, the free market is the best bar exam. If you&#8217;re not bright enough to practice, the free market will remove you from the system. You will not be able to earn a living. The inept graduates law schools should never have accepted eventually run into this natural filter, and it does a great job.<\/p>\n<p>If you try to set up a solo practice, and you stink, judges will squash you, jurors will laugh at you, you will be sued for malpractice, people will refuse to hire you, and you&#8217;ll leave the profession. If you work for someone else, and you stink, that person will eventually fire you, unless he marries you. This is all much fairer than an exam process which costs a tremendous amount of money.<\/p>\n<p>I needed the ABA to save money on the tests it helped perpetuate, so I joined. Like a lot of people, I did not renew my membership. I&#8217;m not paying these socialists to slander conservative judges and attack my civil rights. I&#8217;m not paying them to support bottom-feeding tort parasites in their efforts to bleed society dry. What are they thinking, taking offensive political positions and then asking moral, patriotic people to fund them? It&#8217;s crazy.<\/p>\n<p>They claim to promote professionalism, in order to make the public happy. The public doesn&#8217;t hate lawyers because we&#8217;re unprofessional. Not primarily. They hate us because we&#8217;re greedy, ruthless bullies who destroy other people&#8217;s lives unnecessarily. No popular legal association will ever do anything about that. The foxes aren&#8217;t going to guard the henhouse.<\/p>\n<p>I took the Bar\/Bri course. I took two courses, now that I think about it. I&#8217;m sure my law school made money from it, because they supplied the facilities. I paid to see a lecture by a famous professor who travels around the country reciting the same spiel over and over. About 95% of the material I studied in the courses has been of no value to me in practice. And I have to wonder; if I paid $80,000 in tuition and still had to do this in order to be considered qualified, am I not entitled to a refund?<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re a conservative attorney, do not let the ABA have your money. If for no other reason, decline to join because I refuse to accredit them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DENIED I just received a phone call that offended me. The American Bar Association wanted me to rejoin. I shut them down fast. I said they were too liberal for me, and that they should give me a call when they ceased being a political organization. This bit of pandering filth is from their own [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guns-hunting-fishing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4087\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}