{"id":1182,"date":"2008-05-23T12:11:07","date_gmt":"2008-05-23T12:11:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/74.220.207.152\/~hogonice\/?p=1182"},"modified":"2008-05-23T12:11:07","modified_gmt":"2008-05-23T12:11:07","slug":"like-tred-barta-only-less-smooth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/?p=1182","title":{"rendered":"Like Tred Barta, Only Less Smooth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>New Career Direction or Temporary Insanity?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Hold onto your chairs and plant both feet firmly on the floor. I have shocking news. I have an urge&#8230;to buy a gun.<\/p>\n<p>No, I&#8217;m serious. I really do. I know it sounds crazy.<\/p>\n<p>I feel like my shooting has improved to the point where a more accurate gun would make a noticeable difference. The holes I&#8217;m shooting in my targets haven&#8217;t gotten much smaller, but they&#8217;re a little smaller, and sometimes they reflect 50 shots instead of the 25 I used to shoot. When you shoot 50 rounds instead of 25, your groups should get bigger, not smaller.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s hard to know how accurate guns are from reading reviews. If I were to believe reviews, I would guess that my 1911s will shoot about a 3&#8243; group at 75 feet. That&#8217;s more or less what the SW1911 does in reviews, and the Colt shoots as well as the SW1911. BUT&#8230;gun writers are not great with science. I believe they&#8217;re talking about &#8220;best groups&#8221; when they publish these figures, and they only include three shots. I have a feeling that 50 shots would paint a different and less flattering picture. I suspect that the real figure is something like twice 3&#8243;. Discounting bad groups is bad science.<\/p>\n<p>With either 1911 and a full clip, I can probably wound you reliably at a hundred yards. If you&#8217;re pretty fat and you don&#8217;t move. I extrapolate from my short-range results. That&#8217;s really good effectiveness, for a pistol. At least in my opinion. But at any range above 25 yards, all I can count on is hitting a person somewhere on his upper body. A more accurate gun would presumably be more effective, at long range.<\/p>\n<p>Let me stress that I have absolutely no interest in shooting people. But I have a lot of interest in <i>being able<\/i> to shoot people, so I have some say in whether I or another innocent crime victim gets to live or die. So it makes sense to use the human body as a model when I talk about accuracy.<\/p>\n<p>You can get a Les Baer 1911 guaranteed to have 1 1\/2&#8243; accuracy at 50 yards, with certain ammunition. I suppose if the gun is inherently that accurate, there is no way I would ever get good enough to have the size of my groups significantly affected by the failings of the gun. It would not be cheap. But I should never need to buy another 1911 for target purposes. Barring weird race guns.<\/p>\n<p>Smith and Wesson makes a couple of Performance Center guns that are very nice, and Colt makes Special Combat models and other highly accurate pistols. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d trust Colt, but my SW1911 and my 686 are the loves of my life. Seems like these and the Baer guns are the best choices below a certain price. Although you have to pay Baer extra money to get the 1 1\/2&#8243; guarantee. I&#8217;m inclined to think the Smith is the best choice.<\/p>\n<p>I have learned to read between the lines when I read gun articles, and I&#8217;ve also learned to pay no attention to accuracy claims made by people whose targets I haven&#8217;t seen. About 3% of shooters shoot well. The rest don&#8217;t actually know whether their guns are accurate. To a person who shoots pie-size groups at 7 yards, a change to softball-size groups may seem like great accuracy. But it doesn&#8217;t tell you anything about the gun. I think you have to put a gun in a clamp or turn it over to a very fine shooter in order to learn anything about its accuracy.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever I get, I can tell you this. It probably won&#8217;t be a .38 Super. I love my Colt, but with a .45 you get free brass for life. And I can&#8217;t tell any difference in accuracy or ease of shooting.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll see what they have at the show. Maybe I can get a deal. On the other hand, maybe I should buy a Ransom rest instead. Maybe my guns are already super-accurate, and I don&#8217;t know it.<\/p>\n<p>Hmm&#8230;Caldwell makes a machine rest I can get for $125. That sounds smarter than blowing $1500+ on a gun, on the mere suspicion that it will help.<\/p>\n<p>People are congratulating me on not maiming myself with the cheesy round that failed to exit the SW1911 yesterday. I still can&#8217;t explain it. I had great confidence in the charges. The Lock-N-Load AP is designed so the filled cartridge rotates into your line of vision before you seat the bullet, and you can look into each cartridge. I am sure I did that, but I was more worried about overcharges than undercharges, so maybe I passed a round or two that clearly weren&#8217;t overfilled, yet weren&#8217;t right.<\/p>\n<p>Somebody in the comments expressed surprise that I wouldn&#8217;t notice the difference in the feel of the round going off. Hey, that&#8217;s ADD for you. It doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t concentrate. People with ADD often have super-fantastic concentration. The difficulty is in deciding what to concentrate ON. So it makes sense that I would forget the noise and recoil while thinking about grip, sight picture, stance, trigger pull, follow-through, and so on.<\/p>\n<p>When I was a kid, I used to exasperate my mother because I could never hear her when I was reading.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe a powder checker is a good idea after all. I&#8217;m pretty sure overcharges will never be a problem for me, but undercharges appear to be a threat.<\/p>\n<p>I keep thinking I would like to get into gun writing. I am not the world&#8217;s greatest gun authority, but I have a few other assets. As a lawyer, I can write with some intelligence regarding second amendment issues. As a former scientist, I have some hope of understanding ballistics. And maybe I can sell myself as a humorist. If I could just figure out where to look for opportunities. I&#8217;ll be working on that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New Career Direction or Temporary Insanity? Hold onto your chairs and plant both feet firmly on the floor. I have shocking news. I have an urge&#8230;to buy a gun. No, I&#8217;m serious. I really do. I know it sounds crazy. I feel like my shooting has improved to the point where a more accurate gun [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guns-hunting-fishing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1182"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1182\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/toolsofrenewal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}