Unbelievably, I Need to Buy More Tools

November 29th, 2009

Contain Your Amazement

I forgot to blog yesterday. Is that even possible? There must be some kind of mind ray aimed at my house.

I had a lot of stuff to do. I had to cope with 96 ounces of Costco hamburger, which had to be mixed with salt and garlic and frozen in patties. I had to freeze a crop of bananas before they turned black. And I had to deal with stuff related to my sister’s illness.

I let the burger sit in the fridge for nearly a week, until it turned a nice shade of beige. Fresh hamburger is just no good. You have to let it start to turn a little. I know it will upset some people to read that, but it’s true. We age beef, and hamburger is beef, right? So shut up.

This stuff was a little brown on the outside, with plenty of pink inside to balance it. Once I mushed it up with salt and garlic, it was a nice uniform color. It will make wonderful burgers. Costco claims it’s “extra lean,” but that isn’t true, because if it were, the burgers would be dry and nasty. They’re not. They’re juicy and wonderful.

Costco is selling bone-in rib roasts for around five bucks per pound. Tempting, to say the very least. I’d love to age a couple of those babies and freeze them for later use. Rib roasts are glorious, even if the meat is only choice. Mike says I need to pop one in the Showtime oven. Sounds like a plan to me.

I ran down to Northern Tool today. I don’t like to shop on Sunday, for religious reasons, but they had the warranty part I ordered, and the parts guy is a little crabby, so I needed to get it in hand before he could ship it back. I drove all the way down there, and I asked an employee for help, and he told me the parts guy wasn’t there on weekends.

This is the same parts guy who implied I was a big liar when I said the pulley on my band saw was already chipped when I bought it. It only makes sense that he would fail to inform me that he did not work on weekends.

I sent the employee to talk to the manager, and the news got worse. Not only was the manager unable to do the parts specialist’s difficult job (reaching onto a shelf and grabbing a part and handing it to me); the parts guy was on vacation (probably attending a grouch convention), so I would have to wait another week.

No.

I asked for an audience with the manager, and he came out, and I said surely he could hand me the part. And he agreed. He had been under the impression that I needed to order a part, which requires parts-guy skills. We went to the parts region, and he handed me a box, and off I went.

It must be really easy to qualify for a Northern Tool franchise. The store charges more than the website, and their customer-relations skills are not good. If I hadn’t been pushy, I would have been forced to make the ten-mile drive two more times, in addition to tolerating a ten-day delay.

I am trying to fix up the drill press, although again, not on Sunday. I think I may put a 3-phase motor and a VFD on it. The speeds range from 385 RPM to 2250 RPM, and with a VFD, I could get 200 to 5000, with no loss of torque. I would also be able to leave the pulleys on the middle setting and get a nice wide range of speeds without touching the belts. Plus–come on–it would be fun. And cheap. Even with the motor and VFD, this drill press would be way cheaper than a 17″ Chinese cheapo like the new Deltas or Steel Citys.

I think I’m going to get a Phase II slide table. They’re $243 at MSC, but Enco (different name, same company) sells them for about $90.

Okay, that makes perfect sense.

Anyway, I can stick one of those on the drill press, and I can add a Grizzly cam-action vise, and I should be set for all drilling needs for the rest of the millennium.

Come on. You KNOW I need that VFD. I can hear you grumbling about it, but you know it’s the right thing to do. I have a 2 HP motor which will fit the drill press. I’m sure it will be fine. I don’t totally understand the consequences of going up in horsepower, but it would compensate partially for the loss of torque at low speeds. I don’t think it would hurt the bearings or anything, because the drill bit and the workpiece and the belt drive should be the weak points in the power train.

It’s a mess to explain. The VFD gives constant torque, but because the pulley ratio would not change except in rare circumstances in which I felt motivated to move the belt, you can end up with less low-speed torque than the stock configuration provides. The bigger motor should double the torque, making belt changes necessary less often.

Let’s see. The middle setting on the pulleys is 935 RPM, and the low setting is 385. So you would figure 2.42 times the middle-setting torque when you use the low-speed setting. Right? I think so. That means a 2 HP motor would be pretty close to the machine’s current torque output at low speed, without moving the belt. Dang, how can you beat that? How often would I need that extra 0.42 fraction? Belt moves would be pretty rare.

I can’t believe how much physics I’ve forgotten. I’m actually going to have to draw myself a picture.

I want that VFD, however. I just want it.

I wonder if I can adjust a VFD to increase torque at a given speed. I guess so, since constant torque VFDs would not exist if it were impossible. Maybe I could jack the torque up at low speeds.

Oh, great. Now I’m going to have to download a manual or something. Now I’ll have to THINK. I hate that.

Can’t do anything until tomorrow anyway.

6 Responses to “Unbelievably, I Need to Buy More Tools”

  1. Tziporah Says:

    What’s going on with your sister?

  2. Parallel Says:

    Wanna brush off those elite physics skills?

    Here’s (http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v4.pdf) a paper from a couple of German physicists claiming that the theory of greenhouse warming due to CO2 concentration is incompatible with basic physics. They take a rhetorical sledgehammer to what they call “the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture”.

    Unfortunately I don’t have the physics background to evaluate their work. Are their arguments based on real physics principles and standards, or are they just a bunch of cranks?

  3. jdunmyer Says:

    A VFD and motor combination by definition, is a constant-torque outfit. You won’t be able to “increase the torque” at lower speeds, as the torque is dependant on the motor. A 2Hp motor will develop about 6 ft-lbs of torque, no matter the speed. That’s why the horsepower drops off as you slow it down: at half speed, it’ll develop only half the horsepower. Luckily, it’ll probably still work just fine. I seldom change the belt settings on my step-pulley BridgePort unless I need very high speeds.

    The formula is: Hp = TN/5252, where Hp is horsepower, T is torque in ft-lbs, and N is speed in RPM.

  4. Steve H. Says:

    I read up on this. My question: if you can’t change the torque of the motor, why do VFDs have low-frequency “torque boost” functions?

  5. Aaron's cc: Says:

    http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=186598 seems to suggest that neither the paper noted by Parallel, above nor its refutation in the same journal at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0802/0802.4324v1.pdf were peer-reviewed.
    .
    See also http://antigreen.blogspot.com/2008/02/pesky-physics-for-some-time-people-have.html
    .
    Climate forecasting has many more variables than stock market predictions. Projecting climate decades from now has to be at least as difficult as projecting the US economy that far out. I suggest that the global warmists make their fortunes on Wall Street first and they won’t need federal funding to prove their theories.

  6. Cindy M Says:

    My Grandmother always said, “wood cut on Sunday won’t burn”.

    Leave it be, you have 6 other days of the week to work on this.